I didn't mean to insinuate that the original poster is sexist. That is
absurd. But referring to the "women in IDM" in the following terms, well,
could be opening yourself up for something (?)
Brian Tang writes:
quoted 3 lines We haven't seemed to had then women-in-idm thread in>We haven't seemed to had then women-in-idm thread in
>awhile, maybe someone would like to bring that beast out of the
>closet again.),
Fred Guy writes:
>>and then it usually flares into some tangent socioeconomic philosophy
chatter
Chatter? Why not just call it mindless prattle, while you roll your eyes?
William S. Burroughs was discussed at some length here. So was
Intellectual Property Rights. Why are these topics not considered
"chatter?"
Easy,
Marie
www.floatingcode.com
P.S. My vote is for "chicas in IDM" (yeah, right)