I'd like to ask just one thing. Please, for the list's sake
STOP THIS FUCKING ARGUMENT.
Thanks. Do we _really_ need another art vs. commercialism or
"chems/prodigy are the next big thing" thread? If you're that into it,
re-read the other 34787983279832489732 times the thread has come up
(they're in the archives).
Thanks,
Bill
quoted 10 lines why? u think making money to maybe buy new equipment and expand ones
> why? u think making money to maybe buy new equipment and expand ones
> creative capabilities and maybe make a "better", less-commercial disc
> (because one can afford to) the next time around is "lame"? sure,
> production and distribution expenses grow on trees...or is this the" art
> for arts sake argument"?
>
> tom w
>
> np: system 7 - golden section
>
--
f u t u r e listening radio show - hosted by dj marathon
t h u r s d a y 10pm-1am o n wmtu 91.9 fm
e l e c t r o n i c m u s i c * w i t h * s o u l
http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~wdvanloo/personal/