On Fri, 18 Jul 1997 09:13:04 -0500 "Travis L. Combel"
<ravis1@mindspring.com> writes:
quoted 19 lines Okay, defend your position. What qualifies Prodigy and>>>
>
>>> Okay, defend your position. What qualifies Prodigy and
>Chems
>
>>>as Intelligent (bear in mind that I like most of the new Prodigy
>disk
>
>>>but cannot stand the tracks I've heard off of the new Chems).
>
>>
>
>>the fact that they're making truckloads of money?
>
>>
>
>
>That's pretty lame...
>
why? u think making money to maybe buy new equipment and expand ones
creative capabilities and maybe make a "better", less-commercial disc
(because one can afford to) the next time around is "lame"? sure,
production and distribution expenses grow on trees...or is this the" art
for arts sake argument"?
tom w
np: system 7 - golden section