179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ian McCausland
To:
Cc:
,
Date:
09 Mar 1997 21:43:11 GMT
Subject:
Re: Re: (idm) Re: i've not yet said my piece on u2.
Msg-Id:
<2261970909.29250004@mit.bison.mb.ca>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
kysrsoze@dls.net,Internet writes: Neither U2, or their producers and their remixers qualify as IDM. You may want to discuss this stuff on alt.music.techno (I believe) or some alternative mailing list. If you go there, you won't be flamed or sworn at, you'll find people with similar interests, and none of us will need to read hundreds of emails about something which is pretty cut and dry to begin with. the facist attitude toward whats "thislisty" or not is starting to really piss me off... we all have a common interest,... IDM what we talk about I think should be a matter of personal freedom... if Gloria Estifan teams up with Orbital... or Pat Boone goes JUngle,.. and I wanna talk about it.... I will and there is Nuthing you should be able to do about it....