179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam J Weitzman
To:
Date:
Wed, 05 Feb 1997 18:23:32 -0500
Subject:
(idm) "Rags" to riches
Msg-Id:
<32F91674.250B@individual.com>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
You have to wonder what's happening, with many major US magazines publishing about this "new" kind of music. I imagine that the only reason people are looking into this at all is because of people like David Bowie, U2 and Nine Inch Nails, multi-platinum artists all, who have stated that they like this stuff, they listen to this stuff, and they are interested in incorporating it into their own sound. On the other side, you have record companies thinking, if million-selling artists are incorporating this stuff, it will become very popular, and since people are always looking for something new, these "new" techno bands that have gone the other way to incorporate vocals and "rock" trappings into their music (ie, Prodigy, Chemical Brothers, Underworld) are the ones they're going to woo, to make it easier for them in their first efforts in trying to bring this stuff mainstream. This shouldn't come as any major surprise, really, when you think about what led the press (and MTV) to this point. Some will feel vindicated, some will feel injustice, some will be outraged. I don't need the press to tell me what to listen to, and neither do most of the people on this list, so there's really no need to feel threatened by anything. Even the Newsweek article admitted that the Prodigy are a decidedly lesser image of this music, a shell with all the guts of history and experimentation removed. That said, they also gave them the "most likely to succeed" appellation for exactly that reason. But who knows? Maybe the likes of James, Paradinas and Jenkinson will surprise everyone and be the chart front-runners. I doubt it, but wouldn't it be fun? Why is it any less likely than gangsta rap? My feeling is, if it puts more people in tune with the cool stuff even as it makes the more mainstream stuff wildly popular, that's a good thing. Aphex Twin = Brian Wilson? I think perhaps Frank Zappa is a better analogy. -- Adam J Weitzman "Getting [your computer] to work is no more Individual, Inc. difficult than building a nuclear reactor weitzman@individual.com from wristwatch parts using only your teeth." http://www.individual.com - Dave Barry