179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Microdot in the Aquabahn
To:
basscadet
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Machinemusic Re: City for (idm)?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.95.970121155857.18941F-100000@thetics.europa.com>
In-Reply-To:
<32E51932.2084@geocities.com>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
On Tue, 21 Jan 1997, basscadet wrote:
quoted 1 line It seems its always the same argument over and over. There are no> It seems its always the same argument over and over. There are no
quoted 1 line blah,blah,blah is a waste of time.> blah,blah,blah is a waste of time.
Here is a different way of looking at it: who invented the "machine-aesthetic"? I mean the whole sensibility that blatantly machinel-made music was cool.. this is a cornerstone of IDM as I see it, afterall, intelligent dance music could be made without electronics and machines if the musicians were skilled enough, however, the use of blatantly "elektronik" sounds is a big part of the whole aesthetic, isn't it? So I'd say that the lineage would be... Satie->Cage/Stockhausen->Kraftwerk->Detroit->(from here everything ping-pongs between European countries and the US, though Detroit is still rather isolated in this aesthetic) I just saw a 95 film on a newer Stockhausen peice and remembered how everything he came out with was on the heels of Cage pretty much, so I lump them together. Since CAge was American and Stocky was German(?), that whole duality goes back to before the detroit/europe arguement actually. rock has been that was too from early on. Seems like Americans blindly invent stuff but only Europeans have the taste or education to figure out the wheat from the chaff...imho solenoid@europa.com <------+