I can see why it would *say* that.
Vista, y'know, costs more money?
Greg
On Nov 7, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Irene McC wrote:
quoted 46 lines I'm using Vista on a quad-core machine and must admit to hating it
> I'm using Vista on a quad-core machine and must admit to hating it
> most
> days. Granted, not for audio processing, but graphics editing.
>
> My husband bought a new laptop and immediately ripped out Vista and
> installed XP - runs perfectly, no problems. I can't see why it
> would say ONLY
> Vista compatible?
>
> I
> *
>
>
> On 6 Nov 2008 at 18:38, Nevyn Nowhere wrote:
>
>> What technology exactly says it can't work with XP? I know a lot of
>> companies will just say that with there being nothing actually
>> substantiating such... so what makes you so sure you can't run XP
>> other than
>> that is what they told you? >
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Charles Goodwin
>> <bgood2003@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello crew,
>>>
>>> I recently spilled about a gallon of juice on my PC laptop
>>> (resulting in
>>> its death) and thusly went out and purchased a new one. However
>>> this new
>>> machine is "only compatible with windows vista" because the
>>> technology is
>>> "so advanced". However, as most may be aware, Vista is not only a
>>> horrendous
>>> monstrosity that slowly chews its way through your valuable
>>> cheese reserve
>>> of patience but also it notorious for it driver calamities.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> www.irene-mccullagh.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>