179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: More 'On' or Moron?

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-02-18 16:44Darshan M. Jesrani More 'On' or Moron?
1994-02-19 05:21Jeffrey Kihn Re: More 'On' or Moron?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-02-18 16:44Darshan M. JesraniI dunno about all this. I read one post that said something to the effect of 'Aphex Twin's
From:
Darshan M. Jesrani
Date:
18 Feb 1994 12:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
More 'On' or Moron?
I dunno about all this. I read one post that said something to the effect of 'Aphex Twin's music is very original, because it doesn't sound samey and have that 4/4 thump driving it like every other piece of shit dAnCe tRaK out there.' See, that's just it though - that's such a relativist statement - sure, his music may be WONDERFUL when it's lumped into the 'techno' category - but does it hold up when viewed in the context of music as a whole? I think some of it does - some of it is genuinely beautiful, expressive music - but I don't think that everything he does is worthy of the slavish praise it seems to generate. I read some article in Option (and another in Spin) which compared the Aphex Twin to other accomplished musicians in the 'experimental music' vein. Does this hold? I mean, sometimes I think that a statement like that undermines what a lot of us do musically - when I was a senior in high school I used to sit down and start ideas - most of them were quite melancholic, melodic, little pieces that were highly rhythmic - driven by hip-hop in- fluenced beats - but they remained in loop form, and were never arranged into songs that developed thoroughly and grew. I was just messing around. Then I heard Aphex Twin's Selected Ambient Works and it reminded me of what I used to do, because the tracks were similar in nature and feeling (although my sounds were not nearly as analogue or reverberant), and in structure too. And I would not dare compare myself to any musician who's made a dent thus far in music, be it experimental or not. I can only hope to be able to improve to the point where I'm able to create artistically/musically credible pieces using this medium. I guess what I'm trying to say is that this style/ medium has too much potential that hasn't been reached yet - and to label anyone as a master of it would be extremely premature. I think all of us who are out there making music and learning about the process of creating using this technology are striving toward the same thing. Some may be further ahead than others at this point, but it's all so relative. Maybe I've taken all of this too personally? I'm really good at over-thinking issues, as if you haven't noticed.. Darshan
1994-02-19 05:21Jeffrey KihnOn 18 Feb 1994, Darshan M. Jesrani wrote: > I used to sit down and start ideas - most of t
From:
Jeffrey Kihn
Date:
Fri, 18 Feb 1994 21:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: More 'On' or Moron?
On 18 Feb 1994, Darshan M. Jesrani wrote:
quoted 16 lines I used to sit down and start ideas - most of them were quite melancholic,> I used to sit down and start ideas - most of them were quite melancholic, > melodic, little pieces that were highly rhythmic - driven by hip-hop in- > fluenced beats - but they remained in loop form, and were never arranged > into songs that developed thoroughly and grew. I was just messing around. > Then I heard Aphex Twin's Selected Ambient Works and it reminded me of what > I used to do, because the tracks were similar in nature and feeling (although > my sounds were not nearly as analogue or reverberant), and in structure too. > And I would not dare compare myself to any musician who's made a dent thus > far in music, be it experimental or not. I can only hope to be able to > improve to the point where I'm able to create artistically/musically credible > pieces using this medium. I guess what I'm trying to say is that this style/ > medium has too much potential that hasn't been reached yet - and to label > anyone as a master of it would be extremely premature. I think all of us > who are out there making music and learning about the process of creating > using this technology are striving toward the same thing. Some may be > further ahead than others at this point, but it's all so relative.
That's just it. RDJ's strength is his individualism. Art is what you do, not how you do it. The point is that RDJ put out his own brand of music and it got people excited and he deserves his day in the sun (including crazy interviews) for it. Why not compare yourself? Your individualism is no less valid than anyone else's! You're saying what I said several years ago and now I'm putting out my own record, and it's no Beethoven's Fifth but the people I've played it for have liked it. Aphex will probably never go down as one of the world's greatest musicians, but he certainly has his place in music. --Seofon