179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ

4 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2003-02-24 06:09electric blanket was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
├─ 2003-02-24 19:26Muffin Re: was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
└─ 2003-02-24 19:50Muffin Re: was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
2003-02-25 12:37Scott Sinfield was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2003-02-24 06:09electric blanketMuffin <muffin@signmytits.com> WROTE I'm reading this thread alongside reading Cory Doctro
From:
electric blanket
To:
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:09:55 -0500
Subject:
was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
permalink · <200302240109.AA108527782@dickandjanerecords.com>
Muffin <muffin@signmytits.com> WROTE I'm reading this thread alongside reading Cory Doctrow's "down and out in the magic kingdom" [ http://www.craphound.com/down/ ] and can't help wondering how Whuffle would affect this all ... Goes with my idea of a distributed collaborative A&R system to replace record labels too ... ----- Hola, I haven't read this book (yet), but I am interested in the last line of your post. I had a couple of questions as to how you envision this. Would you have say an artist who wants to publish their music, and thus make it available as a downloadable information costing something? Who would control it, or oversee its operation? I could see this sort of thing working maybe on a smaller scale, where labels actually become the means for peoples self-distribution (ie. labels set up webspace for artists to upload and represent their stuff). but that would open a new can of worms--a label (or other online music dist.) wouldn't want a bigot, for example, to be associated with their label, so it would be a moderated thing. and a label might not like the music of artist X, and not want to be associated with it. Labels are neat. I like well designed art-objects, and don't mind that there is a label that makes and distributes it. And I like vinyl as a medium for music, as does a fairly large audience of electronic music efficienados. Or having a cd in your hand--that tactile sensation of placing it into a decoder and being able to hear it through speakers, it still amazes me. Not to say listening to streaming audio isn't a good concept. But some projects don't seem to make as much sense removed from their packaging. Others don't make sense outside of performance (by a dj or the musician). Would the artist be able to have thier music be made on a per-item basis in some big factory and shipped to the consumer amazon-style? People who are familiar with vinyl-pressing know that this isn't practical for records. So I think there will be a lingering community that will continue to embrace record lps (and thus labels) as long as we have oil to press them. Perhaps as a way to augment the current distribution system, there could become some public domain where artists could make a living producing their music. I think that some would argue that this (paradigm) allready exists in some sense (for example mp3.com). Or were you thinking somewhere completely off my raidar? Don't think that I'm trying to be critical of what you said, I just am curious about your ideas. Sorry if this post is really broad or off-topic. -Geoff http://dickandjanerecords.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-02-24 19:26Muffinon 24/2/03 6:09 am the person going by the name electric blanket at electricblanket@dickan
From:
Muffin
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:26:50 +0000
Subject:
Re: was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
Reply to:
was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
permalink · <BA80227A.21228%muffin@signmytits.com>
on 24/2/03 6:09 am the person going by the name electric blanket at electricblanket@dickandjanerecords.com spake :
quoted 3 lines d can't help> d can't help > wondering how Whuffle would affect this all ... Goes with my idea of a > distributed collaborative A&R system to replace record labe
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-02-24 19:50MuffinHiya, > I haven't read this book (yet), but I am interested in the last line of your > pos
From:
Muffin
To:
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:50:46 +0000
Subject:
Re: was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
Reply to:
was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
permalink · <BA802816.21237%muffin@signmytits.com>
Hiya,
quoted 4 lines I haven't read this book (yet), but I am interested in the last line of your> I haven't read this book (yet), but I am interested in the last line of your > post. I had a couple of questions as to how you envision this. Would you > have say an artist who wants to publish their music, and thus make it > available as a downloadable information costing something?
Not necessarily. I'm trying to trade money for something else. I guess "Kudos" is the best word. Respect for what you do, the way you act, the music you produce.
quoted 2 lines Who would control> Who would control > it, or oversee its operation?
Well, it's a very theoretical idea, but the people who control it are the people producing the music. Like slashdot [ http://www.slashdot.org ] or barbelith [ http://www.barbelith.com/underground/ ] are moderated by the people who contribute to the pool. These are both flawed democracies in one way or another, but a lot more democratic than the current music industry model.
quoted 7 lines I could see this sort of thing working maybe on> I could see this sort of thing working maybe on > a smaller scale, where labels actually become the means for peoples > self-distribution (ie. labels set up webspace for artists to upload and > represent their stuff). but that would open a new can of worms--a label (or > other online music dist.) wouldn't want a bigot, for example, to be associated > with their label, so it would be a moderated thing. and a label might not > like the music of artist X, and not want to be associated with it.
Right, so the point is that I'm going to build a tool that will allow people to upload their own music into a webspace, and have that music contributed to a pool of resources which can be fed back into other sites ... but a lot cleverer. A cross between soulseek, mp3.com, amazon and moveabletype [ http://www.moveabletype.org - not the metal stuff from printing press's]. Then it's down to the peers of the musician to decide whether they are a part of the collective or not. The Whuffle reference. You earn Kudos from your peers, each of who will judge you on different values.
quoted 1 line Labels are neat.> Labels are neat.
Yes, I'd agree with that. I don't want to kill labels that do good things, I want to provide a better mechanism for decent/interesting music working it's way to the top of the pile.
quoted 5 lines I like well designed art-objects, and don't mind that there is a label that> I like well designed art-objects, and don't mind that there is a label that > makes and distributes it. And I like vinyl as a medium for music, as does a > fairly large audience of electronic music efficienados. Or having a cd in > your hand--that tactile sensation of placing it into a decoder and being able > to hear it through speakers, it still amazes me.
You should have seen my gf's eyes light up when I explained to her how the entire system from record to speaker to ear worked :-) I love listening to vinyl on a sunny day as the light catches on the record and produces patterns on the wall above the deck. Makes me realise how physical it all is. And no matter how advanced the computers are the entire analogue audio recording and amplification system is still pretty fucking amazing. And we're still using the same principles for sound amplification we've been using since before computers existed!
quoted 6 lines Not to say listening to> Not to say listening to > streaming audio isn't a good concept. But some projects don't seem to make as > much sense removed from their packaging. Others don't make sense outside of > performance (by a dj or the musician). Would the artist be able to have thier > music be made on a per-item basis in some big factory and shipped to the > consumer amazon-style?
There is potential for this with CDr releases. People have started to realise that CDs are just a distribution mechanism, as are mp3s. Artists will find new ways of making their music unique, whether it is 5.1 surround albums like the forthcoming Plaid album, or limited run hand crafted packaging for CDrs [put the art back into musician as artist, or maybe it's the craft back into arts & crafts...].
quoted 4 lines People who are familiar with vinyl-pressing know that> People who are familiar with vinyl-pressing know that > this isn't practical for records. So I think there will be a lingering > community that will continue to embrace record lps (and thus labels) as long > as we have oil to press them.
There will always be people who are collectors and appreciate the object side of it, but there are also people growing up who will not attach value to Intellectual Property. There will be a balance and a time will come. What I want to die are the fucking popstars who are making shitloads from gullible kids, or the record industry execs who are making shitloads from gullible potential popstars.
quoted 7 lines Perhaps as a way to augment the current distribution system, there could> Perhaps as a way to augment the current distribution system, there could > become some public domain where artists could make a living producing their > music. I think that some would argue that this (paradigm) allready exists in > some sense (for example mp3.com). Or were you thinking somewhere completely > off my raidar? Don't think that I'm trying to be critical of what you said, I > just am curious about your ideas. Sorry if this post is really broad or > off-topic.
No, it's cool. Criticism is good. I'm just ratifying the ideas in my head as it's an extension of something else I'm working on and so building up slowly in the background... mp3.com is close, but not quite what I'm thinking. It's more about people doing things individually and them growing together into a 'scene' ... I'm not very good at explaining it in words. You'll just have to wait and see if it catches on once I get a chance to do it. I guess we might want to take this off list if no-one else is listening and you want to reply... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-02-25 12:37Scott SinfieldHi everyone, this is my first posting to the list as a new member. It's good to see a list
From:
Scott Sinfield
To:
Date:
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:37:58 -0000
Subject:
was: [idm] IDM LIST SUGGESTION ------ EVERYONE PLEASE READ
permalink · <000401c2dcee$2dded2a0$879a7ed4@portal>
Hi everyone, this is my first posting to the list as a new member. It's good to see a list with people saying something interesting and different. Anyone who hasn't set up a label to release records, CDs etc might be surprised at how viable it is. Having recently been involved in starting and running a label for my own and other music, I can vouch for how simple it is, although there are definite (if small) problems along the way. Having been releasing records on a variety of labels in the past few years and having unfortunately had some bad experiences, I thought it would be worth trying to do it myself. Other bands I knew and whose music I liked joined in, making it a collective approach. Using GZ Media to manufacture vinyl and somewhere like Key to manufacture CDs is actually fairly cheap (CDs can work out at about 50p each inc artwork for 1000 copies). Independent distributors are relatively easy to find across the globe. Someone like Cargo in the UK will handle domestic and overseas markets. Other bands I know who've done this totally swear by it. V/Vm were one of my biggest encouragements and influences to do it, as James had great success within his niche and has certainly had widespread coverage for his releases. I've nothing at all against mp3 or other formats. I think they're essential - but they can co-exist happily with CDs/vinyl. I guess I'm just one of those people who likes a CD or record to be part of a complete package, where the artwork etc is an integral part of the release. The records that have had the most influence of what I do (stuff on 4AD, Factory, Warp) all have or had this. Just a thought, anyway. Scott PORTAL www.portal.freeuk.com MAKE MINE MUSIC portal*yellow6*schengen*epic 45*innerise*july skies*avrocar www.makeminemusic.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org