179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] DRUKQS - A handy guide

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: drukqs · drukqs - a handy guide
2001-08-28 02:07Re: [idm] DRUKQS
2001-08-28 11:11Anig Browl [idm] DRUKQS - A handy guide
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-08-28 02:07killog123@juno.comthe new phlex is by far the Least inovative release he's signed his name to. the piano bit
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:07:33 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] DRUKQS
permalink · <20010827.220734.-800791.0.killog123@juno.com>
the new phlex is by far the Least inovative release he's signed his name to. the piano bits are not very good at all (satie's life was much more interesting than his music imo) the 'prepared' piano tracks are only slightly better. and the beat tracks are nothing new (at all) besides the fact that he's extended his drum kit a bit (a bit of 8 is allways great). nothing to freak out about, i think allot of ppl are gonna be bummed to say the least.. personally i would've rather waited a few years and heard something new and fresh from him. word. -='=- On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:50:24 -0700 (PDT) ugly and mean <ugly_and_mean@yahoo.com> writes:
quoted 61 lines --- "Matthew E. Bochnewich" <bochnewich@snet.net> wrote:> > --- "Matthew E. Bochnewich" <bochnewich@snet.net> wrote: > > Here's my little track-by-track commentary on the 'supposed' > Drukqs > > album. I do firmly believe this to be legit. I'll eat my fucking > hat if > > it's not. I've been taking things in from afar for a while now. > This is > > my first genuine contribution to the list. To quote > Latyrx,"Sometimes > > the people who talk the most have the least to say." I'd like to > assume > > the opposite as true also :). And as a footnote, I've never > really > > written a review in my life, so take that for what it's worth. > Let's > > begin... > > Thanks for the entertaining breakdown. > > I downloaded the first disc of Drukqs yesterday and skimmed through > it > really quick, and my impression was: > > The production is great, the album just has the feel of an album > done by > an artist at the top of his game. I know that's kind of an > abstract > "review", but I can't really describe it any other way. It just has > a > real sense of energy and life to it that only comes from inspired > art. > When I heard he was coming out with a new album, my hope was: If > he > doesn't come out of retirement with something completely different > and > groundbreaking, I hope he at least comes out of retirement to show > the > thousands Aphex Jr. bands that he's still the best at working within > the > style that he created. > > That's all I have for now. > > ===== > check out my station on Live365 - over 8 hours worth of early 90's > chill-out, IDM, dub and more at: > http://www.live365.com/stations/278479 > check out my homepage at: http://www.skack.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! > Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-08-28 11:11Anig BrowlWhenever a long-awaited album from an established artist appears, the sad fact is that som
From:
Anig Browl
To:
IDM List
Date:
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:11:14 +0100
Subject:
[idm] DRUKQS - A handy guide
permalink · <010901c12fb8$210d6b20$66b8869f@pauls>
Whenever a long-awaited album from an established artist appears, the sad fact is that some people are too broke/lame/isolated/deaf to hear it for themselves. This is a serious problem, as inability to make authoritative comments can lead to feelings of inadequacy, and eventually serial killing. So in the interest of saving lives, here is an essential guide to talking about the new Aphex Twin album. Simply toss out these phrases at random intervals and you too will look like a mean, moody, post-everything music critic. NOTE: You are licensed to use these cliches *only* in relation to the new Aphex Twin album, DRUGKS. Reverse engineering, altering, or retrofitting these comments to apply to other record releases is a violation of your license and will invoke expensive and horrifying legal penalties. 'Why did it take so long for RDJ to make DRUKQS?'. 'Not long enough in the studio, this is really unoriginal.' 'I wish he'd go back to his old sound, I hate this new stuff.' 'He's a genius.' 'Just raided his archives.' 'I like it better than Confield.' 'Ae is doing something different to RDJ.' 'I hate it but I will keep it for completeness' sake (I can't get refunds at my record store).' 'Nobody else crafts their sounds as carefully as RDJ.' 'I think it captures a real spirit of [insert any previous album/track].' 'I wonder how much of it was recorded in the bank and how much in the boot of an old mini.' 'I just listened to DRUKQS while drunk/stoned/having sex, and [link with any other comment].' 'Has anyone noticed the sleeve notes :-) [Do not refer to anything specific]' 'Aphex Twin fans tend towards trainspotting. [use this if anyone says you are talking crap]' 'RDJ told me he read this list for a while but gave up. [Another good evasion tactic]' 'I just noticed he's used some sample from [invent a movie title].' 'I think track XX blatantly rips off [obscure and unloved mp3-only artist].' 'Maybe [obscure and unloved mp3-only artist] is RDJ.' 'I had that RDJ in the back of my cab once.' Album reviewers!! We know that you do not have much time to actually listen to records, and that it is much more fun to go to major-label parties and snort cocaine from the thighs of an attractive model. Frankly, this underground stuff is a terrible blight on music journalism as it demands you go back to forming opinions and explaining the so-called 'new sound' to your ignorant readers, who secretly think you are a tosspot but envy your not-quite-a-rock-star lifestyle. With this in mind, we have constructed a handy kit which will be adequate for any review of less than about 500 words. If you have extra space which you must fill with copy, simply add some amusing personal anecdote and say that it occurred just before/during/after listening to DRUKQS. Just pick words at random from the list below and mix with some articles, prepositions and punctuation marks. You can also use similar words from a thesaurus. The guy across the room has one and knows what it is for. Throw in some track titles from the album at random, and voila! another cutting-edge, hip-as-fuck review, which will cement your status among everyone who counts. Be careful not to actually say anything specific about any individual track. Beginning acid-munching 'Richard D. James' enigmatic experimental tank-driving 'beavering away' finally long-awaited Windowlicker. Middle Surprising blend old new retread cutting-edge reminiscent 'finest moment' nadir gorgeous abrasive terrifying 'scale the heights' intriguing 'IDM list' frustrating 'Analogue Bubblebath' explorations fundamental basic unhinged 'I care because you do' [name some other band]. End listening experience however predicatable sparkling moment ultimately success failure 'already owns a bank' Mozart. Finally, if you as a reviewer or fan feel an extreme lack of confidence when someone asks you about DRUKQS in a social situation, you may find yourself unable to reel off these phrases in a 'cool' fashion. You will certainly not get laid/retained in your job if you begin stammering or turn red in the face, as there are powerful signals of evolutionary weakness, and people are ultimately just animals, animals. If you find yourself in desperate straits, one single sentence will get you out of the tightest corners. Practise this carefully in a mirror, and try to develop a lip curl or a good shrug to go with it. If you still feel insecure, grow a beard and clutch your chin during moments of stress, it works for me. The magic sentence, which will deflect all hard-to-answer RDJ conversational gambits: 'I'm not into Aphex Twin...didn't he have a hit on MTV a while back?' My friend and yours, Anig Browl _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org