179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] mac sequencers

8 messages · 6 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
2001-01-18 00:53[idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-18 08:23christian adam hresko [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-18 14:38NuBreaks Re: [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-18 19:59Charles R. Terhune Re: [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-18 20:01Charles R. Terhune Re: [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-18 22:37Re: [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-19 04:39jon anderson Re: [idm] mac sequencers
2001-01-19 14:39Charles R. Terhune Re: [idm] mac sequencers
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-01-18 00:53Hectik9@aol.comHi, Im looking for recommendations on Macintosh sequencers. I mostly use soft synths, and
From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:53:50 EST
Subject:
[idm] mac sequencers
permalink · <77.efedba3.2797989e@aol.com>
Hi, Im looking for recommendations on Macintosh sequencers. I mostly use soft synths, and now I want some sort of sequencer/tracker. The features can be pretty minimal. Right now im just looking for free/shareware, but ill probably be buying better software in the next few months. recommendations would be greatly appreciated. cheers Sam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-18 08:23christian adam hreskomac sequencers. the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support, great
From:
christian adam hresko
To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 03:23:13 -0500
Subject:
[idm] mac sequencers
permalink · <3A66A7F0.5462D178@ix.netcom.com>
mac sequencers. the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support, great piece of software, and it works extremely well with Reaktor. cubase isn't my cup of tea. i was never a fan of cubase, and i don't think i ever will be. very glitchy and unpredictable. (which is a BAD thing in software) but i would suggest downloading demos of whatever interests you and try them out for yourself. and if you like it, buy it. unless it's Max / MSP. why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when RDJ did it. actually, i still think that track kicks ass. but it's been done. so please don't do it again and again. unless you can do it better. or something. and i don't think he used MIDI delays to achieve that effect. if you listen very carefully, you can here the samples and or patches being processed. probably an MSP trick. Using the pumping lemma, we can show that there are algorithms to test if a given finite - state acceptor accepts any input at all and to test if it accepts a finite or infinite number of input strings. The next theorem shows that, in order to test these properties, we need only test whether or not the finite - state acceptor will accept some word from a suitable finite list of words. The algorithms for these properties then consist of testing whether or not the given finite - state acceptor does indeed accept any strings on this finite list. To test if a finite - state acceptor accepts a string, simply try all possible computations on this string; or else use theorem 3.7 to obtain an equivalent deterministic machine and then run the deterministic machine with this string as input. 3.7 Theorem If M is a nondeterministic finite - state acceptor, then we can find a deterministic finite - state acceptor MD such that A(M) = A(MD). cheers, (char)christian;
2001-01-18 14:38NuBreaks> the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support, > great piece of so
From:
NuBreaks
To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:38:47 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
permalink · <003801c0815c$5dea89c0$0100a8c0@mpinet.net>
quoted 2 lines the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support,> the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support, > great piece of software, and it works extremely well with Reaktor.
Not to start a huge "this vs. that" discussion, but Logic Audio Platinum is just as functional as Digital Performer IMO. You can create insane environments that suit your needs/imagination and it integrates with VST Instruments/plugins well. It can also use TDM hardware if you have it. I use both but find Logic far quicker to get ideas down with. Logic comes with over 30 proprietary plugins which are surprisingly good (love the Bit Crusher). Though, DP also has the proprietary thing going with their MAS plugins which can also be very cool. Check out the Audioease Nautilus Bundle - it has a really wicked granulator called Riverrun. Demos are available. www.audioease.com As stated in previous posts, it all depends on what sequencer works best with your setup/working methods. Try a few out and pick the one you like. No one should tell you which to use. ed :::::: Future Funk & Fury :::::: ::: http://www.nubreaks.com ::: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-18 19:59Charles R. TerhuneYou can also get some kicking plug-inss from Pluggo for only $79 bucks for 80 plug-ins. ht
From:
Charles R. Terhune
To:
NuBreaks ,
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:59:21 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
You can also get some kicking plug-inss from Pluggo for only $79 bucks for 80 plug-ins. http://www.cycling74.com Fun. CRT
quoted 29 lines the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support,>> the only sequencer worth buying is Digital Performer. great support, >> great piece of software, and it works extremely well with Reaktor. > > Not to start a huge "this vs. that" discussion, but Logic Audio Platinum is > just as functional as Digital Performer IMO. You can create insane > environments that suit your needs/imagination and it integrates with VST > Instruments/plugins well. It can also use TDM hardware if you have it. I > use both but find Logic far quicker to get ideas down with. Logic comes > with over 30 proprietary plugins which are surprisingly good (love the Bit > Crusher). Though, DP also has the proprietary thing going with their MAS > plugins which can also be very cool. Check out the Audioease Nautilus > Bundle - it has a really wicked granulator called Riverrun. Demos are > available. www.audioease.com > > As stated in previous posts, it all depends on what sequencer works best > with your setup/working methods. Try a few out and pick the one you like. > No one should tell you which to use. > > ed > > :::::: Future Funk & Fury :::::: > ::: http://www.nubreaks.com ::: > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
Charles/C-FOM _________________________________________ C-FOM: 411A highland avenue, #312 Somerville, MA 02144 TEL - 617.388.7466 http://www.cfom-music.com out now: "KOLO - Diversions of Grandeur" CFOMCD006 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-18 20:01Charles R. Terhune> why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when > RDJ did it. It w
From:
Charles R. Terhune
To:
,
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:01:05 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
quoted 2 lines why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when> why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when > RDJ did it.
It was even cooler when Autechre did it 1st abut 2 years before Richie. Charles/C-FOM _________________________________________ C-FOM: 411A highland avenue, #312 Somerville, MA 02144 TEL - 617.388.7466 http://www.cfom-music.com out now: "KOLO - Diversions of Grandeur" CFOMCD006 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-18 22:37andrei@world.std.com"Charles R. Terhune" wrote: > > why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it wa
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:37:18 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
permalink · <3A677012.CAFE9EFB@world.std.com>
"Charles R. Terhune" wrote:
quoted 4 lines why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when> > why does everyone want to make bouncing ball sounds? it was cool when > > RDJ did it. > > It was even cooler when Autechre did it 1st abut 2 years before Richie.
It was even cooler when Dick Raaijmakers did it about 10-15 years before Autechre in his "Ping-Pong" piece. Bouncing ball music for real. http://www.near.nl/near/raaijmakersengframe.html Andrei --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-19 04:39jon andersonwhat autechre are you referring to that did it before RDJ? I've always traced that techniq
From:
jon anderson
To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
permalink · <20010119043922.25462.qmail@web616.mail.yahoo.com>
what autechre are you referring to that did it before RDJ? I've always traced that technique (using layers of extremely rapid articulations of transients to create ratchety/creaky/bouncing ball effects and whatnot) back to aphex's hangable auto bulb in '95. J *****
quoted 1 line why does everyone want to make bouncing ball>> why does everyone want to make bouncing ball
sounds? >it was cool
quoted 4 lines when>when >> RDJ did it. > > It was even cooler when Autechre did it 1st abut
2 >years before
quoted 3 lines Richie.>Richie. > >Charles/C-FOM
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-19 14:39Charles R. TerhuneHmmm. I'll have to go back and listen. I first hear dit on their 1st Peel session which is
From:
Charles R. Terhune
To:
jon anderson ,
Date:
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:39:50 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] mac sequencers
Hmmm. I'll have to go back and listen. I first hear dit on their 1st Peel session which is '95, if I remember correctly tly. But I've only heard it from Aphex on the Bucephalus thingie everyone talks about. Amazingly, I could be wrong! CRT
quoted 28 lines what autechre are you referring to that did it before> what autechre are you referring to that did it before > RDJ? I've always traced that technique (using layers > of extremely rapid articulations of transients to > create ratchety/creaky/bouncing ball effects and > whatnot) back to aphex's hangable auto bulb in '95. > J > ***** >>> why does everyone want to make bouncing ball > sounds? >it was cool >>when >>> RDJ did it. >> >> It was even cooler when Autechre did it 1st abut > 2 >years before >>Richie. >> >>Charles/C-FOM > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
Charles/C-FOM _________________________________________ C-FOM: 411A highland avenue, #312 Somerville, MA 02144 TEL - 617.388.7466 http://www.cfom-music.com out now: "KOLO - Diversions of Grandeur" CFOMCD006 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org