179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] rook - crook?

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-04-25 13:59j l [idm] rook - crook?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-04-25 13:59j lmissy - he / she / it - firstly your post is not only innacurate and hurtful but legally s
From:
j l
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:59:21 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Subject:
[idm] rook - crook?
permalink · <20000425125921.24700.qmail@fsmail.net>
missy - he / she / it - firstly your post is not only innacurate and hurtful but legally slanderous ("crooks"), yes, if we wanted we could haul you up in court, but we prefer to sort things out by our own methods point one -there is not one ounce of subtance in your comments point two - we have put our heart and souls into what we do, promoted the work of many unknown artists and have seen virtually no financial return in 2 years i am not going to go into details about specific artists, (suffice to say that chris douglass was sent copies of his record (via sean cooper) and was contacted about permission for his track, which he will be paid for - chris seemed ccol with it - where do you come in? from where i am sitting you seem to be unaware of he economic realities of running a label such as ours..someone needs to teach you a lesson rgds docktor barnes http://www.onoksid.freeserve.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org