179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) explosive chemistry

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-10-10 02:13Sean Cooper (idm) explosive chemistry
└─ 1996-10-10 04:04Jon Drukman Re: (idm) explosive chemistry
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-10-10 02:13Sean Cooper>"We have explosive" and a track called "We have explosive (herd killing)" >are both on th
From:
Sean Cooper
To:
Date:
Wed, 9 Oct 1996 18:13:44 -0800
Subject:
(idm) explosive chemistry
permalink · <v01510108ae820a9d9fd6@[204.156.134.105]>
quoted 5 lines "We have explosive" and a track called "We have explosive (herd killing)&qu>"We have explosive" and a track called "We have explosive (herd killing)" >are both on the Wipeout 2097 CD. I haven't heard the FSOL album yet, but >after Jon Drukman's review I suspect "We have explosive" to be the same as >on the album, and the other one to be a longer version of "Herd killing" >(5:42, rather than 2:36).
i've misplaced jon's review, but god i hope not. i finally heard "explosive" the other day (knowingly, anyway; i heard it in the shops when the promos were circulating months ago and almost sprained my wrist seizing it of the deck). i've never considered fsol particularly derivative (well, their source material is, but what they do with it, imo, isn't), nor would i (at least six months ago) have been very quick to speak their name and the word "pandering" in the same breath, but now i'm not so sure... the world didn't even need _one_ chemical brothers... sc onnow: atom heart : mono tm (rather interesting)
1996-10-10 04:04Jon DrukmanAt 6:13 PM -0800 10/9/96, Sean Cooper wrote: >>"We have explosive" and a track called "We
From:
Jon Drukman
To:
Date:
Wed, 9 Oct 1996 21:04:47 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) explosive chemistry
Reply to:
(idm) explosive chemistry
permalink · <v03007802ae8225d25ff2@[206.79.132.104]>
At 6:13 PM -0800 10/9/96, Sean Cooper wrote:
quoted 15 lines "We have explosive" and a track called "We have explosive (herd killing)&qu>>"We have explosive" and a track called "We have explosive (herd killing)" >>are both on the Wipeout 2097 CD. I haven't heard the FSOL album yet, but >>after Jon Drukman's review I suspect "We have explosive" to be the same as >>on the album, and the other one to be a longer version of "Herd killing" >>(5:42, rather than 2:36). > >i've misplaced jon's review, but god i hope not. i finally heard >"explosive" the other day (knowingly, anyway; i heard it in the shops when >the promos were circulating months ago and almost sprained my wrist seizing >it of the deck). i've never considered fsol particularly derivative (well, >their source material is, but what they do with it, imo, isn't), nor would >i (at least six months ago) have been very quick to speak their name and >the word "pandering" in the same breath, but now i'm not so sure... > >the world didn't even need _one_ chemical brothers...
sorry sean, usually i agree with what you say but you need to give it another listen. it doesn't sound anything like the chem bros... WAY harder and more abrasive. also much more technoish. chembros are more like hip hop beats with acid squiggles on top. there's no comparison... anyway, yes, herd killing is probably the same as we have explosive (herd killing) since a lot of the same sounds are in both herd killing and we have explosive on the album. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Drukman jsd@cyborganic.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------