179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Luis-Manuel Garcia
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:36:22 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] ...another mechanical piece of noise
Msg-Id:
<DD93FAA2-6EE6-11D9-A45B-000D934358DA@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<20050125045248.82453.qmail@web41009.mail.yahoo.com>
Mbox:
idm.0501.gz
On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:52 PM, William Samuels wrote:
quoted 11 lines I have a pretty good amount of noisy/experimental> I have a pretty good amount of noisy/experimental > stuff in my music collection, and I don't care for the > "DSP wankery". I've heard it plenty and the novelty > wore off a long time ago. > > I think some people use it to hide the fact that their > tune is really boring in the first place. > > And why does most of this clattery dsp idm lack bass? > Are most of these people lacking studio monitors, and > mixing it down on crap headphones?
1. Is novelty the only thing valuable about IDM, then? 2. Is bass essential to IDM? Luis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org