179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
John/Slackonomics
To:
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:14:34 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] (OT) shopping for an Ipod
Msg-Id:
<5C8D8F4A-2759-11D9-9E4A-000502B18FAA@slackonomics.com>
In-Reply-To:
<417E55B4.30407@damek.org>
Mbox:
idm.0410.gz
On Oct 26, 2004, at 8:48 AM, Adam Piontek wrote:
quoted 6 lines And I don't see how by then I wouldn't be able to play my AAC audio> And I don't see how by then I wouldn't be able to play my AAC audio > files ... given the ubiquity of the iPod, it would seem any future > iPod-killer would really have to be able to play AAC files. At the > very least I could re-rip my collection and transcode what I don't > have on CD. Which I wouldn't mind having to do if it's sufficiently > distant in time (around that 10 year marker).
Just for the record, AAC isn't entirely Apple's invention. It's part of the MPEG (motion pictures expert group) consortium's industry-standard codec. It is the successor to MP3. It's part of the MPEG-4 standard, actually. Since it's a standard, you'll have little fear of the AAC files not playing. A lot of the other players haven't adopted the standard yet, which is inexplicable since AAC is truly a standard with the MPEG group behind it, but it's just a matter of time before they do. Especially considering AACPlus is coming out very soon. I personally went the Apple Lossless route since no audio is compressed, and I can transcode without loss of audio, too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org