It seems as though it was a situation where the few
ruined it for the many. The msg on the planet-mu
board gave that reason anyway, but if there are an
admitted "many" that benefit, then why allow the few
to ruin it? Its not like a community pool where if
one person pisses in it then everyone has to get out.
Just ignore the messages. You have to expect, when
dealing with an open forum, some bad seeds. [take my
posts here for example ;) ] Thats just life. I don't
remember it being especially bad there or anything.
But they would know better than I.
I've never been a webmaster of course so I don't know
all the work that goes into maintaining a board...
Just seems like a bit of an overreaction.
--- Joyrex <joyrex@ev1.net> wrote:
quoted 12 lines True, some forum software (YaBB is notorious for
> True, some forum software (YaBB is notorious for
> this) generate HUGE amounts
> of bandwidth, but both the µ and WARP forums both
> used minimal graphics (and
> the µ forum wasn't that heavily trafficked anyway,
> which what made it nice)
> so I don't think bandwidth was the issue. Of course,
> I could be wrong, but I
> am sure WARP's bandwidth allotment is sufficient for
> their online store to
> function at peak capacity.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org