i think language should be continually evolving,
remixed by whoever chooses to say whatever, there
are many ways to appropriate many words in new
contexts that still manage to convey their meanings,
and using words in new ways may often manage to imbue
a phrase with an more effective descriptive purpose.
if i were just slightly more daft i'd suggest that
e.e. cummings had the dopest flow of the first half
of the 20th century.
if humans ought not be segregated, then why should
words be?
gregory,
characteristically nonplussed (and unfinished with)
about:
http://jeanpaulasthma.com
---
Ben Kirkley <ben.kirkley@displaypost.co.uk> wrote:
quoted 13 lines on 8/9/01 1:25 PM, ?? ???t at Oways@msn.com wrote:
> on 8/9/01 1:25 PM, ?? ???t at Oways@msn.com wrote:
>
> > Pardon me list members,
> >
> > Now I have got this complaint before....
> >
> > If I use Chap, Bloke, mate.....dodgy or
> whatever...
> > SO WHAT.......I hear every American and his/her
> in-laws
> > trying, real hard, to use African American slang
> > in a "cool" way, but I dont never send them
> > a message saying, "why are using this term?".....
etc. etc.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org