the S2000 and MPC2000 both use inferior AD/DA converters to the
S3000/MPC3000 ... i don't know about the S1000 but since that was at one
point one of the "flagship" samplers, i would assume the converters are
better sound quality ... ease of use is an entirely different matter
however
but it doesn't matter how easy to use it is if it sounds like dirt IMHO
--
String Theory : Digital Music for Humans
http://www.enteract.com/~yoshi/index.cgi
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Kent williams wrote:
quoted 24 lines On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, daniel lee wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, daniel lee wrote:
> >
> > The S1000 is a far better machine than the S2000 and subsequently costs more
> > than a new S2000. I think it sounds far more gritty, I'd definitely get one
> > if I could afford to. It is a shame it won't work with Steinberg Re-Cyle
> > though.
> >
> You know I don't want to be a crank, and this is all probably off topic,
> but the S2000 is a significant upgrade to the S1000 with respect to
> OS and other features, and there really isn't that much difference between
> them in sound quality. And I'm a gear slut -- you'll never in your
> life see a used S1000 going for more than a comparably equipped S2000.
>
> And the S1000 works fine with recycle, but you're limited to MIDI transfers.
>
> If you really believe that the S1K is superior, I'll sell you my S1000PB.
> I can't get anyone else to buy it at any price!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org