179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ian Pojman
To:
Date:
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:28:45 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] drugs
Msg-Id:
<GNENLFEHEAMCLLIMHOOHEEBJCBAA.ian@webice.net>
In-Reply-To:
<8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A2325D7E9@SECTORBASE1>
Mbox:
idm.0009.gz
are you guys accomplishing much by nitpicking back and forth on a list about electronic music? i guess im the pot calling the kettle black... anyway, about drugs, tripping especially, I learned that after I used them to open my mind that I really didnt need them. I guess that counts as having opened up my mind, but I feel, er, I know that the true artistic ingenuity lies in the soul. Emotions. And I feel this is what lacks in a lot of IDM nowadays, its just, to quote a friend, digital masturbation. you dont need drugs, or a handicap, you need something to struggle with, that is to say an apex to strive towards. thats my POV. Drugs fuck with your emotions, so thats how I see them coming into play. anyway. enough about drugs already?
quoted 115 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: Gause, Brian [mailto:bgause@SECTORBASE.COM] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 1:09 PM > To: idm@hyperreal.org > Subject: RE: [idm] art, Miles, drugs + gratuitious Hk imitation > > > All > > I'm plainly not advocating recreational drug use. I'm also not > trying to say > that being stoned or drunk makes you a better artist. What I AM trying to > say is that the human brain is complex. Sometimes a drug or a > drink can open > new pathways to thought and some people enjoy this. > > And, yes, my analogies do work. I'm not trying to claim that being deaf is > like being stoned except to say that on the outside (i.e. those NOT > personally affected), these states of being are impossible to comprehend > completely. > > My point is that judging artists to have 'wasted' their talent or > 'misused' > their gifts is a mistake. Firstly, some may have benefitted from > their fate > (whether chosen or not) in ways you cannot understand and, secondly, > pretending to understand such conditions, THEN judging others on this is > irresponsible. > > I'm not talking about artists being satisfied with their production or how > artists feel about their interactions with the world, I'm talking > about not > judging people (artists and everyone else) by or because of their living > conditions. > > Shame on you for not seeing that. > > ---brian > > ------------------------ > Brian W. Gause > Senior Technical Writer > SECTORBASE.com > 568 Howard Street > First Floor > San Francisco, CA 94105 > Direct: (415) 365-8203 > Fax: (415) 365-8263 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James R McPherson [mailto:andregurov@juno.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 5:18 PM > To: idm@hyperreal.org > Subject: [idm] art, Miles, drugs + gratuitious Hk imitation > > > Need I use the example of none other an artist than John Coltrane, who > was kicked out of Miles' classic quintet b/c of a serious heroin > addiction. I believe the central point is that people with serious > problems create great art in spite of addiction, not because of it. You > mention musicians with whom YOU have no first hand experience. Has Brian > Eno spoken with YOU about how fantastic his production work with Laraaji > was? And how much better it was when he passed out in the engineering > chair? Or did Hendrix tell how fantastic the music in his head was while > in a 16 hour rush? In a 16 hour crash? I seriously doubt any artist > will be gratified with his production, whether straight or stoned. This > drive is what continues to make them vital. The sides of this issue can > be debated ad nauseum by people of OUR uninformed ilk. But so > charismatic and plainly wrong an example as Beethoven's deaf work holds > false when measured up to Konitz's quite personal observation. > There is a world of difference between being addled and being deaf, and > in being epileptic and smoked out. Shame on you for not knowing and > noting the difference. Try keeping your analogies on the same level of > logic. > > Yes, some IDM records sound quite fantastic while under the influence > (well, when I can manage to get them on the turntable!). I just hope the > people who make these (and any others I own) don't think they can drive > as well under the influence as they can write music to/with/under it. > > Back on topic: Lackluster's _Container_ is wonderful. Or, in Hk!'s > words, "I dig it, fellas & Cats!" Hmm, we don't know what we got 'til > it's gone ; ) Without Kelly, I feel my Nuron addiction going into > withdrawal. > > J > > >***************** > >This is plainly not true. Beethoven was deaf when he wrote his 9th > >Symphony...does this mean we have to be deaf for it to sound as good? > >Does > >the 9th Symphony then sound "terrible" to those of us that can hear? > >I mean no offense here, but it seems startling to me that you (and > >millions > >of other people) continue to argue against the use of substances with > >ZERO > >first-hand experience. > >**************** > > ________________________________________________________________ > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org