179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
steve
To:
n:h ,
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:46:41 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] re:instruments
Msg-Id:
<200008140950.JAA51400@smtp.ixpres.com>
Mbox:
idm.0008.gz
i have only used the demo and was quite impressed. saying that you can't get something original out of it is ridiculous...that's like saying you can't get something original out of a modular synth...sure...some stuff is recognizeable vut that doesn't mean you are forced to do the same... steve ----------
quoted 6 lines From: "n:h" <nate@toshoklabs.com>>From: "n:h" <nate@toshoklabs.com> >To: godpup@ix.netcom.com >Cc: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] re:instruments >Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2000, 8:28 AM >
quoted 26 lines On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 godpup@ix.netcom.com wrote:> > > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 godpup@ix.netcom.com wrote: > >> MetaSynth (yeah, everyone is using this. it's hard to get anything >> original out of it at this point in time) > > I have to respectfully disagree with the above. You can certainly spot > obvious metasynth use on a number of IDM releases, including say Lilley of > the Valley, but the potential of the app to deliver very different sounds > that do not sound, for lack of a better phrase, 'all sparkly' is certainly > there. I think a big part of this is a lot of people for whatever reason > use the built in waveforms or variations thereof which all have a very > similar and identifiable sound... > > my .02 > > nate > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org