I prefer to use a time moniker instead.
quoted 22 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Sherburne [SMTP:philip@Ask.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 9:40 AM
> To: 'idm@hyperreal.org'
> Subject: (idm) re: exp. time sigs
>
> my problem with 3/4:
> it never fails to remind me of waltzes.
>
> i hate waltzes.
>
> 6/8, now: there's a time signature i'm ok with.
>
>
> >Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:03:09 +0100
> >From: martin <martin.wood@advent-comm.co.uk>
> >Subject: Re: (idm) experimental time signatures
>
> >i think that 3/4 is a criminally underused time signature in modern
> >(electronic) music, or using 8th note triplets in either 3/4 or 4/4
> >i feel it has a kind of in built-groove which is sadly lacking in a
> >lot of electronic stuff...its not too experimental..but wtf...