179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Solenoid
To:
Alex Reynolds
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) my apologies
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.980903133259.1253E-100000@thetics.europa.com>
In-Reply-To:
<l03110704b214508e81a7@[130.91.128.110]>
Mbox:
idm.9809.gz
Couldn't "true" quad sound be done this way, then? On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Alex Reynolds wrote:
quoted 26 lines That sounds almost like you're describing some sort of error correction on> That sounds almost like you're describing some sort of error correction on > a piece of vinyl... > > Such a two-tracked record could be played on a deck with a two-needle arm, > the distance between needle tips equalling the distance between groove > valleys. The advanced deck would be less susceptible to bumps *and* able to > take the two signals and subtract noise from either, like a pair of > chromosomes. Something like that could be "complete without surface > noise"... > > :: Alex > > >My question is: has anyone made a record with two parallel grooves that > >spiral inward between each other that have different tracks with the same > >bpm that have the their cue points line up, such that if the needle skips > >to the other track (the one in parallel, not one groove ahead or behind) > >it is still in time and in sync? Whew! > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Alex Reynolds Distributed Support Specialist > Department of Biology School of Arts & Sciences Computing > University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA > email:reynolda@sas.upenn.edu phone:215.573.2818 > > >
solenoid@europa.com <------+