179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Michael Stein
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:39:05 -0600
Subject:
(idm) more on vinyl vs. CD
Msg-Id:
<12ECA72628E0D311842400A0C92E41E20142E2@smtp.masterchart.com>
Mbox:
idm.0003.gz
Jeff @ Ninja Tune wrote:
quoted 3 lines Basically most indie labels are run by a bunch of obsessive record>Basically most indie labels are run by a bunch of obsessive record >collecting geeks with thousands of pieces of vinyl crowding out their >house....so really you got to expect this kind of thing.
As much as I hate to drag this on... I consider myself to be one of these collecting geeks. But I don't understand why the collectibility is always associated with the vinyl. I buy both vinyl and CD, but prefer CDs - I generally buy the vinyl (if vinyl only) and put it to MD. It's not so much about convenience but about ruining the product. Everytime I play the vinyl, it deteriorates the product, i.e. it becomes worthless. So what makes the LP/12" more collectable? Just the bigger size? With most of my collection of geeked-out expensive rarities (everything from Ae, Aphex, Warp/SKAM to poppier things like Stereolab, Saint Etienne, and New Order/Factory stuff), with a few exceptions, if there is a vinyl pressing and a CD pressing of the same thing, the CD always collects more money on the auction/selling block. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org