179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chaircrusher
To:
Che
Cc:
Intelligent Dumb Music
Date:
Wed, 20 May 1998 10:45:26 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: How Music Is Made (Re: (idm) Ae new lp - a quick mention
Msg-Id:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.980520104206.29457E-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSI.3.96.980519231414.25810B-100000@beacon.synthcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9805.gz
On Tue, 19 May 1998, Che wrote:
quoted 4 lines At 08:57 PM 5/19/98 -0500, thatcat@ix.netcom.com wrote:> At 08:57 PM 5/19/98 -0500, thatcat@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > >it is far easier to record a keyboard part into a sequencer than to > step-enter or otherwise program the notes.
It's easier if you can actually PLAY keyboards. Not a skill I possess.
quoted 4 lines It really depends on the composer. Step time isn't any more tedious than> > It really depends on the composer. Step time isn't any more tedious than > playing live if you're experienced (I find that older people have more > trouble with step-time because they didn't grow up w/ computers).
Ha, you young whippersnappers, I fart in your general direction! Any more, I'm most comfortable cutting and pasting digital audio to do my programming. Now that's BELOW step time MIDI recording -- it's like writing music with tweezers and a microscope. Perhaps it's some reflection on my essential lameness that I like stuff better when I put it together without hearing it, than when I play it in.