On Sat, 31 Jan 1998, Steve /k/./F/ wrote:
quoted 27 lines thats an ambiguous statement! Panasonic arent shit! andif youre> > >thats an ambiguous statement! Panasonic arent shit! andif youre
> > calling
> > >Einsturzende Neubauten shit...well then
> > >lets fight!
> >
> > nono, i really like EN, but panasonic is poop. i honestly don't
> > understand
> > why people like them. not at all. we played with them in cleveland
> > last
> > summer. we saw what they do and heard what comes out of it. whoever:
> > their
> > live show is MUCH MUCH better than their recorded stuff. but it's
> > still not
> > very good.
>
> Yeah i mean i mainly base my views of them on a live gig in sheffield
> from about 2.5years ago... but i do enjoy their albums (albeit not
> often).... they were absolutely
> stunning live imo.. but i can imagine how it could fall apart lie or
> just be boring..
>
> > it's like they try to impress everyone with their music-less-ness. :)
> >
> maybe FM Einhart will inject some emotion and grooove into the mix...and
> some dirt,
> panasonic lack dirt (not that 'clean' digital dirt they use ;-)
>
i guess i feel i must speak up for the other side. of what i have of
panasonic (kulma & vakio) i love them. i havent had the chance to see
them live, but i can see how a live performance has the chance to be
_very_ different from their recordings. no, panasonic has no groove.
they arent trying to groove. panasonic is minimal (taken to extremes at
times) simple, thoughtful, enjoyable, listenable, zen-like,
trance-inducing, and it made my friend essej say "this is the only music
that i have heard that caused physical pain. please turn it off."
im a sucker for art.
(does anyone remember the label -danger music-?)
---
jeremiah jti0001@jove.acs.unt.edu
people.unt.edu/~jti0001
---
excuse me but i just have to explode
explode this body off me wake-up tomorrow
brand new a little tired but brand new
bj?rk