179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ashok Divakaran
To:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:34:36 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
RE: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
Msg-Id:
<"A1864ZXFASZWOW*/R=WBWASH/R=A1/U=ASHOK DIVAKARAN/"@MHS>
In-Reply-To:
<01ISFYLDOOAO8WWJDS@POMONA.EDU>
Mbox:
idm.9801.gz
quoted 15 lines Irene C. sez>> Irene C. sez> > > > it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or > originality *for its time* but you may never truly live that music or > have it engrained into your bloodstream the way you will with > music that forms part of your growing and evolving experience. > > > If I had the time, motivation, or words, I'd assert that there are different > ways to come to experience music... radio, dancefloor, dub-on-tape-from-friend > -- and they're all valid and significant. > > Is it not possible to come to experience music from the past and still *truly > live* the music and have it engrained in your bloodstream?
Yes, it is, but not quite in the same way. Anyone who still plays Howard Jones (I plead guilty - only on occasion, though) without blushing will know what I mean :-) Ashok