179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Sun, 2 Nov 1997 16:23:48 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) illegible covers, graphic design etc.
Msg-Id:
<E0xS0my-0000as-00@relay01.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To:
<971102060830_-325521424@emout03.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9711.gz
On 2 Nov 97, Tsog5000@aol.com wrote:
quoted 2 lines as a graphic designer, the line between form and function and is> as a graphic designer, the line between form and function and is > something we have to deal with all the time.
Thank you for your informed, well thought out and - dare I say "intelligent" - response to my gripe about Chiastic Slide's cover. We're not talking opposite ends of the spectrum here. I worked in theatre stage management, advertising (specifically styling for photo shoots), worked in the University's media section for 6 years and have had photographs published. So I fully relate to your debate regarding artistic merit.
quoted 2 lines Is the cover of an album supposed to serve a function? Does copy on> Is the cover of an album supposed to serve a function? Does copy on > the sleeve really need to inform the viewer,
Every time I'd answer a resounding YES. Fine : if you must make the cover a work of art, go ahead. But *somewhere* in the liner notes, or inside the sleeve or printed onto the disc itself.... please let the more pedantic among us have relevant (maybe some of you consider it irrelevant?) information such as : Artist, release date (year) and tracklisting. It's also nice to have some reference regarding the names of who actually collaborated on the work, who producee (if applicable) etc. Or just call the whole damn thing "Symphony No. 1" and let it flow :- ) I * "Incomplete without surface noise" - Autechre