179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
....
To:
D'Neye
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:36:40 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) (skann ahhtek)ur associatively
Msg-Id:
<3446B318.B9F571A4@virgin.net>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
quoted 27 lines Chiastic Slide is undeniably a progression from> >Chiastic Slide is undeniably a progression from > >Incunabula.... albeit not a huge one. > > man tu es muy loco matey. ahh kidding. i kant even listen to > incunabula > after hearing chiastic, but i suppose "huge" is a rather ambiguous > term. > there is hella mo' 'motions 'n musikal maturity present on cs. > see:hub.nuane > and lest i forget to mention the brilliant use of rhythmic, harmonic, > and > dynamic nuances executed on cs that are lacking on many of their older > > releases, but i suppose this point is arguable to some. check out that > > entire segue into a shuffle (12/8 triplet) feel on cipater (starts @ > 03:15 > into it)..'n the "hi-hat" rhythmic flip into the new feel at 03:38. > that > shite is just staight up schmoove manz. of course, if you crave > polyrhythms, brian ferneyhough 'n dem there new complexists may > alleviate > you while inadvertently causing innard decay as previously exemplified > by > our friends carcass (well, fermenting innards anyway) and cannibal > corpse > (w/chris barnes vox.) sense. antisense.
why cant i have more replies like this? :) Steve /k/./F/