quoted 6 lines well that depends.> well that depends.
> some people "only have the one album in them",
> and when they try for a second, it sometimes
> sucks, all their good ideas came out on the
> first one. in that case, their first *would*
> be better than the second.
That sounds like a great discussion...
My choices:
Chemical Brothers, for one album. Popularized a great new sound, then
destroyed it with a sub-par rehash.
The Prodigy, for their first two albums... The first is just classic fire-
it-up rave in yo face bizness that brings back lots of good memories, and
their second album rocked the funky joint with what I considered to be a
tremendous transition out of the cliche chimpmunk sound. Those beats were
good and _loud_ too! But, this last effort sounds like sub-par Chemical
Brothers to these ears.
np: erasure. go vinnie go!
--
guyjr@ns.gt.ed.net | I.D.M.- That stage in sleeping when your feet are
a.k.a., Guy Elden, Jr. | moving faster than your eyes.