179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
g.
To:
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 17:06:42 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Parallel Imports
Msg-Id:
<3309f70f.25405912@sygnet.syspace.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<c=US%a=SOHO%p=SOHO%l=AQUAMARINE-970212164831Z-42@aquamarine.wanderlust.com>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997 11:48:31 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines But isn't the US copyright holder the same as the foreign copyright>But isn't the US copyright holder the same as the foreign copyright >holder (i.e., the artist?) And therefore, wouldn't said artist generally >give themselves permission to sell their own records?
??? an artist with a record deal does not (generally) retain any copyright.
quoted 3 lines In the case where a record label may own a copyright (and not the>In the case where a record label may own a copyright (and not the >artist), wouldn't it be in the US label's best interest to keep the >imports highly priced to drive US consumers to the domestic disks?
if a us label has paid a lot of money (not that that's likely ;) for the *exclusive* rights to sell a record in the their territory they do not want people to sell identical records for which they don't get paid - at any price. g.