179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Nathanel Karl Harrison
To:
David Ross
Cc:
Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:09:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Nonsense about NIN, Bowie, etc.
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.95.970204205617.9075A-100000@orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us>
In-Reply-To:
<32F44CD7.77CB@mb.sympatico.ca>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, David Ross wrote:
quoted 3 lines Okay. In 1990, I listened (and liked) NIN (among other things.) In> Okay. In 1990, I listened (and liked) NIN (among other things.) In > 1997 I listen to (and like) drum n bass (among other things). Why can't > Trent Reznor's tastes evolve in the same way mine have?
I see your point but I think there's a difference: Trent is unfortunately in that position where as an artist he is expected to come up with something 'groundbreaking' since his previous output has at least in my eyes been somewhat interesting. I don't care that that every teenybop bought downward spiral-it's a damn good album which does things I hadn't heard before. However, his new song is something I have heard before-Trent singing on top of some piano/guitar distortion with a chopped up breakbeat over the top. To me this signals that he is no longer a 'leader' or 'innovator' but rather a follower, which doesn't interest me at all. The song doesn't push any limits (ala Aphex Twin in terms of the debate between well done esotericism vs. garbage re the new album). The song is just catchy enough that those unfamiliar with IDM, Drum n'bass etc will snatch it up as the 'new sound', propelling our music further into the limelight when you and I both know it's the same schlock that TR put out years ago... my .02, Nate
quoted 2 lines> >
Nate Harrison DIGITAL MAGICIAN http://www.globalwise.com/DIGIMAGICIAN/ WWW Authors and Electronic Imaging Specialists