"Lazlo Nibble" <lazlo@swcp.com> wrote :
quoted 5 lines Hey, as far as I'm concerned, any site that isn't at least *decipherable*>Hey, as far as I'm concerned, any site that isn't at least *decipherable*
>with the most bare-bones text-based browser *is* fucked up. Intentionally
>designing informational sites that require you to use one particular
>piece of software to access them completely misses the point of putting an
>informational site up on the web in the first place . . .
Well said, Lazlo ! I entirely agree.
The *least* that people could do is to put up 2 versions of their web
pages...one with fancy graphics & one with just the plain text.
Merry Christmas everyone !
Aca