On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Dan Smith wrote:
quoted 12 lines You mentioned that they play> > You mentioned that they play
> > basically the same set. What do you expect, they only have one album? All
> > the other bands at Organic have more albums. Also, the Chemical Brothers
> > haven't been around that long. What maybe a year and a half? I think if I
> > saw ANY band four times within a year, their set wouldn't vary that much.
>
> No, the Chem Bros (and as the dust bros) have been around longer than a
> year and a half. As far as having only one album, that's wrong cause the
> have a variety of singles as well with tunes not on the mainstream
> US release. I believe the point is that they must not have done anything
> new, where most of the rest of the acts which performed at Organic had new
> material and new releases (meat beat, orbital, orb with one coming soon.)
I dont get you guys who didn't enjoy this show!!! I think they _have_
done "something new" just by making the music they are making. Who made
tunes in this style besides a couple of people before them? And even
they(MBM) were in a different vein of sound. The Chemicals' sound is
being ripped off by sooo many people that it's ridiculous to expect their
sound to be original anymore, after so many have stolen it. I still
think they were the best ever!! And the new material sounds awesome.
quoted 4 lines cover the techno scene. Why should anyone ever buy URB when we have IDM> > cover the techno scene. Why should anyone ever buy URB when we have IDM
> > and Muzik? I hope that URB can improve or catch up.
>
> That was pretty schmucky of you to openly flame like this...
Uhh, I think he was just stating the honest truth. Look at the Urb with
Underworld on the cover. Everything in there was at least a couple of
months old. But hey, it's not their fault, their just following the same
american trend of being behind in the music scene. Muzik is still the
best, imho.
James Benjamin Gill-----jgill@u.arizona.edu**********************************