179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Farm A Cist
To:
tkorpipa
Cc:
idm mailing list
Date:
Sat, 9 Mar 1996 10:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) Non-composers: RHK, was Satie
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.960309104038.959C-100000@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.960306105021.1827A-100000@amadeus.siba.fi>
Mbox:
idm.9603.gz
quoted 6 lines On a related note, it?s interesting how satie didn?t at times consider> On a related note, it?s interesting how satie didn?t at times consider > himself to be a composer. More of a scientist, I think. Althought his > famous signature was: ?Erik Satie, Composer of Music? or something, he > often claimed not be a composer. This is quite interesting, because many > IDM (and other electronic-based) composers have similar attitudes. u-ziq > comes to mind.
Egad! I just picked up "Art of the Sixth Sense: Cabaret Voltaire" last night (incidently, non-arty CV fans should know that their name is from the 9-month-lived cafe in which the Dadaists converged regularly). Anyway, in the book, Richard H. Kirk said that he still didn't consider himself a musician but more of an experimenter who was just sort of using music as the tool (paraphrased a bit). Many of the noise/experimental musicians (?) I've played with seem to feel this way. Plus, I've always prefaced playing noise music for, uh, normal people (that is relative, yes) by saying that they might be more likely to enjoy/be-open-to what I play if they don't consider it music at all. This seems true for rhythmic electronic music too, whereas most listeners may choose to identify the beat with music-side of what they are listenning to and the rest as, uh, well, "bleep, blloop, whoooosh" David Chandler - chandler@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us (503)301-3011 grep -i casio goodwillbins >> mystudio ; grep -i atari goodwillbins >> mystudio ;