179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Greg Earle
To:
Date:
Sat, 25 Nov 1995 14:07:39 -0800
Subject:
(idm) Re: Tri Repetae, Dreamfish, etc.
Msg-Id:
<9511252207.AA09142@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.951125024251.23294A-100000@mail.sdsu.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9511.gz
Julius Caesar Salad wrote:
quoted 10 lines What bugs me about FW2 is that it's not musically or emotionally>> What bugs me about FW2 is that it's not musically or emotionally >> original. Most of what it has to offer has already been done. > > I respect your opinion on it, but isn't that true of most music? There > is very little that has never been done before somewhere in terms of > style or approach. An example I haven't seen mentioned much is that a > good portion of the early Aphex material (the noisy stuff) was a > derivation of the fairly obscure early 80's industrial group "Esplendor > Geometrico." Many who had never heard EG thought "Wow. this is something > wild and new" when it really wasn't.
I'd be willing to bet that Richard never heard an Esplendor Geometrico tape in his life. I won't pretend to speak for all the members of Former Industrialists With A Clue[tm] haunting this list, but I have several EG tapes and I don't know what you're on about :-) Other than the fact that the early Aphex stuff is "Industrial sounding", I don't think it bears resemblance to Industrial forebears at all. That's exactly why I liked it so much - it was taking sonic elements that I greatly liked and pushed them into new frontiers/corners of the sonic palette. (I think it's more interesting to note how the old-timer Industrialists are now showing up on comps that are landing in the "Ambient"/"Trance" comps at Aron's in Hollywood. And yes, they have a separate Industrial/Experimental section, so it's not like they're wontonly misplaced.) - Greg