179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris Fahey
To:
'Guai Lo' , 'Q-Bot Eye' , 'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:40:45 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) Dude. Playing live...
Msg-Id:
<99A78A9183B4D311B7CC00508B72D5D903153D@NY2MSG01>
Mbox:
idm.0001.gz
quoted 2 lines Amen to that. There's going to have to be a paradigm shift> Amen to that. There's going to have to be a paradigm shift > in the way that live IDM shows are performed.
Word. As far as I'm concerned, if the artist cannot demonstrate real-time virtuosic skill, if they don't have an interesting stage show (I'm not talking lasers), or if they don't have some kind of charismatic, hypnotic stage personality, then there's no point in going to see them live on stage (you know, the rawk format) at all. It's like going to see a composer write music on paper or watching someone paint. It's even a bit degrading sometimes to go see an artist I like, only to see them spin records or move a mouse around. I feel like a rawk hero worshipper of the lowest kind. Of course, many listmembers would likely pay to be in the same room as Aphex Twin even if he did not perform at all. I won't. EXCEPTION 1: Seeing *underground* artists do experimental live shows whose format violates my above rules is okay -- since usually I'm not familiar with their work, and live shows can help give me an idea of what the artist is all about, while also supporting the scene and their artistic development. The formality of the 'concert' format is great for encouraging discourse about the music itself, which is not likely if the music was played as background music. EXCEPTION 2: Banging dance events where the artist's presence is irrelevant to the fact that the "scene" and sound system are so thrilling that attention to a stage or an artist is pointless. -Cf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org