| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2004-09-0818:19 | iteration zero <iterationzero@gmail.com> | Re: [idm] Suction Recommendations On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:58:55 -0700 (PDT), StaticBeats
|
| 2004-09-0819:34 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] Suction Recommendations [iteration zero |
| 2004-09-0817:58 | StaticBeats <stupidnametaken@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] Suction Recommendations Snow Robots Volumes 1 & 2 are markedly better than 3
imo. 3… |
| 2004-09-0820:52 | <utility@unrecognized.org> | Re: [idm] Suction Recommendations i'll admit to having a biased opinion...
it all counts! (so… |
| 2004-09-0818:10 | Adam Piontek <adam@damek.org> | Re: [idm] Suction Recommendations I would narrow that down to just:
Lowfish - 1000 Corrections Per Second… |