179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

re: valid idm posts

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-02-14 00:13re: valid idm posts
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-02-14 00:13peter.gebert@popserver.uni-konstanz.deMary Kyrola O'Hagin's posting, i think, is ok, given that she gives reason why she uses th
From:
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 1994 01:13:17 +0100
Subject:
re: valid idm posts
Mary Kyrola O'Hagin's posting, i think, is ok, given that she gives reason why she uses this list (though i don't think it's the grasp of technology but the fun with suggestive names that makes the average idm-subscriber a reasonable candidate to ask). that is, i'm not annoyed. (btw, mary, your signature slogan is great.) of course let's read the question about the silent records compilation. do i think discussion of valid topics for discussion is valid? ;-) mary's question is not a discussion topic. ...i think the only one who is to judge whether the subscribers are discussing "valid" subjects is the one who has to administrate the server, right? p.