179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] i believe.

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2001-01-29 19:35[idm] i believe.
└─ 2001-01-29 22:19adam florin Re: [idm] i believe.
2001-01-29 20:02Gause, Brian RE: [idm] i believe.
2001-01-30 04:55...(Sunsp0t)... Re: [idm] i believe.
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-01-29 19:35Phonotype@aol.comi have noticed on the list that some of you people are way caught up in the means by which
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:35:09 EST
Subject:
[idm] i believe.
permalink · <4e.10c145c6.27a71fed@aol.com>
i have noticed on the list that some of you people are way caught up in the means by which things are created. this tends to let the inital concept or goal get burried behind tonz of meaningless shite. we should notice tracks/releases as packages (actual music, title, intent of the artist, design of the concept) when we start talking about the process as much as the impact of the track we lose the artist's intent. i beleive all the talk about process is there for people who are at a loss for creativity. fuck how you make shit! does it sound good? is it interesting? was it worth the $10.00 - $30.00 that you paid for it? i hope so cause the records i buy i listen to first. maybe you should. originality is becoming harder and harder to get a hold of nowadays. its just a thought. phonotype@aol.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-29 22:19adam florinhrmm, yes, but you must understand that HOW something is made IS interesting to a lot of p
From:
adam florin
To:
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:19:39 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] i believe.
Reply to:
[idm] i believe.
permalink · <p04320403b69b9bb918ac@[128.148.222.12]>
hrmm, yes, but you must understand that HOW something is made IS interesting to a lot of people. idm is a medium of creative expression, be it musical or logical. sound is a good medium for experimenting with complex maths. some very fine music (esp. classical) was composed merely as an experiment in this 'meaningless shite' ; in an instrumental composition, how do you determine what has 'meaning' ? see my above post on intention. you also seem to neglect the concept that perhaps the artist's intention was merely make some music in an interesting way. .af. At 14:35 -0500 01.29.2001, Phonotype@aol.com wrote:
quoted 24 lines i have noticed on the list that some of you people are way caught up>i have noticed on the list that some of you people are way caught up >in the means by which things are created. this tends to let the >inital concept or goal get burried behind tonz of meaningless shite. >we should notice tracks/releases as packages (actual music, title, >intent of the artist, design of the concept) >when we start talking about the process as much as the impact of the >track we lose the artist's intent. >i beleive all the talk about process is there for people who are at >a loss for creativity. >fuck how you make shit! >does it sound good? >is it interesting? >was it worth the $10.00 - $30.00 that you paid for it? >i hope so cause the records i buy i listen to first. >maybe you should. >originality is becoming harder and harder to get a hold of nowadays. >its just a thought. > >phonotype@aol.com > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-29 20:02Gause, BrianI understand the difficulty, here, but I'm not so sure it's a bad thing. What is happening
From:
Gause, Brian
To:
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:02:08 -0800
Subject:
RE: [idm] i believe.
permalink · <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23556A10@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com>
I understand the difficulty, here, but I'm not so sure it's a bad thing. What is happening, both musically in idm and on this list, is simply increased complexity. I'm going to stick to the music metaphor, but it's equally true for the evolution of this and other mailing lists. As you grow, you learn more. As you learn, you analyze more. As you analyze more, you understand more. You never understand everything and there's always something else to learn...BUT, you do gain a larger understanding of your subject, i.e. this music. It's called depth...increased complexity...expanding conscious awareness. Whatever. Ten years ago, I was happy to hear "Didgeridoo" by RDJ and love it. Today? Well, today, I want to know more. I can enjoy the track on an emotional level, but I also want to enjoy it on an intellectual level. Sometimes this means I want to understand how it was created because that understanding makes for a richer, more complex experience. The same sort of thing happens with mailing lists (and all kinds of social interaction). As this list passes through time (evolves, grows, progresses...hehe, whatever), it DOES change. We're not as focused on informing fellow listees about new music as we used to be and we're not as cohesive as a musical scene as we were 5 years ago, but what the hell...things change. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't...but this is what happens with life. This list is developing its own style...its own conscious awareness...even to the point where anyone visiting in the last year or so could write a personality sketch of this place and most of us would say, "yeah, okay, that's us! I recognize that." What we've created here is a virtual space, philosophical ramblings and all...that's what happens with communities. And if some people feel they can enjoy some of this music more by understanding how it works or how it was produced, so be it. That understanding won't replace the emotional enjoyment, at least for me...but sometimes I just want to know. And what's wrong with that? Sometimes it's about the artist's intent, but if you can combine that with an understanding of an artist's success in achieving that intent or some notion of the effort it took to create that art...well, that's something new, isn't it? And as for originality? I would hold that the 'amount' of originality in the world doesn't change...not very much. You're just not looking in the right place because you're absorbed deeper into this place. Depth is about building on earlier ideas...depth, by definition, can't be as original as earlier ideas because it's a further exploration of similar concepts. Either you have depth or you have surface level originality based on New ideas. Rarely do you get both to the same degree. If you want originality, go explore the music of tribes native to Borneo or some of the more remote islands of Micronesia. just some of what I've been thinking about recently... ---brian ------------------------ Brian W. Gause Senior Technical Writer SECTORBASE.com 568 Howard Street First Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Direct: (415) 365-8203 Fax: (415) 365-8263 -----Original Message----- From: Phonotype@aol.com [mailto:Phonotype@aol.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:35 AM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: [idm] i believe. i have noticed on the list that some of you people are way caught up in the means by which things are created. this tends to let the inital concept or goal get burried behind tonz of meaningless shite. we should notice tracks/releases as packages (actual music, title, intent of the artist, design of the concept) when we start talking about the process as much as the impact of the track we lose the artist's intent. i beleive all the talk about process is there for people who are at a loss for creativity. fuck how you make shit! does it sound good? is it interesting? was it worth the $10.00 - $30.00 that you paid for it? i hope so cause the records i buy i listen to first. maybe you should. originality is becoming harder and harder to get a hold of nowadays. its just a thought. phonotype@aol.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-01-30 04:55...(Sunsp0t)...>does it sound good? yeah, the first 10 times it was copied. >is it interesting? Not anymo
From:
...(Sunsp0t)...
To:
Phonotype@aol.com
Cc:
idm@hyperreal.org
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:55:0 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] i believe.
permalink · <200101300455.UAA10030@gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
quoted 1 line does it sound good?>does it sound good?
yeah, the first 10 times it was copied.
quoted 1 line is it interesting?>is it interesting?
Not anymore
quoted 4 lines was it worth the $10.00 - $30.00 that you paid for it?>was it worth the $10.00 - $30.00 that you paid for it? >i hope so cause the records i buy i listen to first. >maybe you should. >originality is becoming harder and harder to get a hold of nowadays.
Isn't that the whole point?!!
quoted 8 lines its just a thought.>its just a thought. > >phonotype@aol.com > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
______________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sunsp0t sunspot@subdimension.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org