179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) < classify! >

5 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) < classify! > · (idm) < classify! >
1999-10-27 18:34(idm) < classify! >
└─ 1999-10-27 20:23Aaron S Michelson Re: (idm) < classify! >
1999-10-27 21:58Chris Fahey Re: (idm) < classify! >
├─ 1999-10-27 23:14eric hill Re: (idm) < classify! >
└─ 1999-10-28 07:51Irene McC Re: (idm) < classify! >
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-10-27 18:34BigKumquat@aol.comThe advantage of the sheer "alphabetical by artist" approach is that you don't have to pon
From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 14:34:23 EDT
Subject:
(idm) < classify! >
permalink · <0.5b740feb.25489faf@aol.com>
The advantage of the sheer "alphabetical by artist" approach is that you don't have to ponder genre dilemmas ad nauseum. On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections housed on special shelves. I know there are times (e.g. zoning/sleepytime) when nothing but ambient will do, and its a fine thing to have all ambient titles stashed together somewhere (monolake's gobi ep is current ambient champ). In my sytem, artist releases must be grouped according to date of release, rather than alphabetically by title. Exciting, no? Man, I've got librarian blood in my family. Imagine going to Simon Reynolds' place and checking out his categories: heroin house, geektronica, thrashstep, crunch-and-twinkle, nerdcore and so on. - Fred Church http://www.thelocus.com/kumquat - free kumquat cd's, always and forever, until we run out -
1999-10-27 20:23Aaron S MichelsonExcerpts from mail: 27-Oct-99 (idm) < classify! > by BigKumquat@aol.com > On the other han
From:
Aaron S Michelson
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
Reply to:
(idm) < classify! >
permalink · <4s5pwfG00UiB06CbA0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Excerpts from mail: 27-Oct-99 (idm) < classify! > by BigKumquat@aol.com
quoted 2 lines On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections> On the other hand, sections can be fun - perhaps a few special sections > housed on special shelves.
My solution: 1500 CDs.... I have a huge rotating rack that I store things... some by artist (and related) i.e. Autechre/Skam, Aphex Twin, anything Global Communication do, etc. Then I have some by label... Rephlex stack, the Source stack, the Ninja Tune stacks, etc. etc. I also have a special CD rack just for FAX records releases.... I have around 80 of them, so they fit nicely in one of those cheap black plastic things. Then sorta kinda by style.... a few stacks of mixed CDs.... and the rest is just thrown in there where ever I have room. I also have two fully-packed US Post Office crates filled with CDs I don't usually listen to, but feel like holding onto (for some reason). 1300 Records.... Bought industrial shelving from Home Hardware for $40. All the stuff I usually play out is kind of in the middle of each shelf. The stuff I don't play out too much is on the sides... crap is on the bottom. Some jungle-related stuff is on one shelf on the left-ish side... :) So you see, I'm organized. Not to mention the 100+ records and CDs strewn all over my floor and covering all my equipment. Aaron
1999-10-27 21:58Chris FaheyFirst Rule of classification: If you're going to organize alphabetically, go by the *first
From:
Chris Fahey
To:
IDM \(E-mail\)
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:58:31 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
permalink · <93A9C7D71478D211ACEC00805F65C14FD6DB48@STEAMER.raremedium.com>
First Rule of classification: If you're going to organize alphabetically, go by the *first word* in the artist's name (besides 'a', 'an', 'the', etc.) even if it is the artist's first name. This saves you the trouble of deciding where, say, Jake Slazenger or Jon Spencer Blues Explosion goes. DJ Spooky goes under 'D', both Amon Tobin and Aphex Twin go under 'A', etc. Second Rule: Artists with multiple names must go together, so Wagon Christ goes with Plug goes with Luke Vibert. Third Rule: Record stores are experts in getting customers to the material they are looking for. Model your collection's organization paradigm after your favorite record store. Fourth Rule: Eat kosher salamis! Fifth Rule: Like Record stores do, keep a separate section for New Releases (or, rather, New Acquisitions). When I buy a new CD and then file it away in the shelves, sometimes I'll forget it's there for months. If it didn't grab my attention on the first listen, I may never give it a second go round if I don't keep it segregated from the rest. Sixth Rule: Don't just organize so that you can find what you want - organize to find what you didn't even know you wanted. Organize so you can match your state of mind with a unknown musical selection. For this reason, I separate "Old Jazz" from everything else in my collection - if I'm in the mood for Old Jazz (non-contemporary jazz, that is), I don't want to weed through a bunch of DJ This and DJ That to get to Diz. Don't get bogged down with classification angst! Seventh Rule: Hey, it's your collection, so organize it first and foremost for yourself. Be absurdly idiosyncratic if that's what helps you find stuff. Peter Becker has to have the most bizarrely but strictly organized record collection I've ever seen, with tabbed dividers creating sections like "German Electronic, Non-Kraftwerk" or something like that. Works for him. - Cf ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - c h r i s t ø p h e r f ª h e y . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ chrisf@raremedium.com 2 1 2 - 6 3 4 - 6 9 5 0 x 2 5 8 http://www.raremedium.com - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - . _ . - ' ^ ' - .
1999-10-27 23:14eric hillEighth Rule: Rent (and watch) Barry Levinson's "Diner." eric
From:
eric hill
To:
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
Reply to:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
permalink · <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910271613370.1745-100000@shell3.ba.best.com>
Eighth Rule: Rent (and watch) Barry Levinson's "Diner." eric
1999-10-28 07:51Irene McCOn 27 Oct 99, Chris Fahey wrote re: Re: (idm) < classify! >: > Fifth Rule: Like Record sto
From:
Irene McC
To:
Date:
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:51:21 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
Reply to:
Re: (idm) < classify! >
permalink · <E11gkLD-0005Xi-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
On 27 Oct 99, Chris Fahey wrote re: Re: (idm) < classify! >:
quoted 5 lines Fifth Rule: Like Record stores do, keep a separate section for New> Fifth Rule: Like Record stores do, keep a separate section for New > Releases (or, rather, New Acquisitions). When I buy a new CD and then file > it away in the shelves, sometimes I'll forget it's there for months. If it > didn't grab my attention on the first listen, I may never give it a second > go round if I don't keep it segregated from the rest.
YES! I cannot second this loudly enough. I've got far too many that have fallen into this trap, especially if I go on 2nd hand shop trawls and pick up a few releases in one day ::: I'll end up listening to my favourite a few times over and forget I even have the others, which will then get filed deeper and deeper within boxes of other stuff. Bad move. I now have a shoebox on my desktop, containing about 30 "must get around to listen to these" CD's that I try to rotate to get to know what's on them. Aaah, the joy of excess!! I * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org