IDM Mailing Archive

1998-06-26 19:08giLly&KERimarsel wrote: > > about those first 'idm' things.. > i'm wondering why nobody puts in the

From:: giLly&KERi <galaxey@earthlink.net>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 19:08:11 +0000
Subject:: (idm) the shamen/first things

marsel wrote:

quoted 3 lines about those first 'idm' things..

> > about those first 'idm' things.. > i'm wondering why nobody puts in the 'en-tact' album by the shamen.

OH MA GAWD, I forgot about that album. Fuck yeah. That was the "2nd" album I bought, right after ORB's Aubrey mixes. I listened to that Oxygenate (something like that) track for hours. ANd Move Any Mountain is a great tune (I don't what yawl think) for its time! gilly (aka marcel) np: seofon- Process ep

1998-06-26 21:27marselabout those first 'idm' things.. i'm wondering why nobody puts in the 'en-tact' album by t

From:: marsel <marsel@sonik.demon.nl>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 23:27:18 +0200
Subject:: (idm) the shamen/first things

about those first 'idm' things.. i'm wondering why nobody puts in the 'en-tact' album by the shamen. pretty big over here at the time, together with 808 state' ninety. and after that the first orbital and the lfo album came up. along with the detroit things as techno 1 & 2, and also the biorythms compilations. that's what i assume as some sort of pre-idm, before planet e' intergalactic beats and warp's artificial intelligence came along. oh. my first things in the era should be marrs and bomb the bass. 'beat dis'

1998-06-26 22:42Jon Drukmanmarsel wrote: > > about those first 'idm' things.. > i'm wondering why nobody puts in the

From:: Jon Drukman <jsd@gamespot.com>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 15:42:13 -0700
Subject:: Re: (idm) the shamen/first things

marsel wrote:

quoted 3 lines about those first 'idm' things..

> > about those first 'idm' things.. > i'm wondering why nobody puts in the 'en-tact' album by the shamen.

because that was when they started to really suck. their previous albums were much better.

quoted 1 line pretty big over here at the time, together with 808 state' ninety.

> pretty big over here at the time, together with 808 state' ninety.

ah yes, now that is a *stellar* album. i still listen to it pretty regularly. -- Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Plan: Eat right, exercise regularly, die anyway.

1998-06-27 01:15ae1650@wayne.eduI beleive shamen en-tact is a very good album, but not one of my firsts.. actually I just

From:: <ae1650@wayne.edu>
To:: Jon Drukman <jsd@gamespot.com>
Cc:: <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date:: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 21:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:: Re: (idm) the shamen/first things
Reply to:: Re: (idm) the shamen/first things

I beleive shamen en-tact is a very good album, but not one of my firsts.. actually I just bought it about 2 months agom ( I got sick of borrowing my friends copy ) my first idm experience was probably U-ziq tango n vectif. bb. On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Jon Drukman wrote:

quoted 18 lines marsel wrote:

> marsel wrote: > > > > about those first 'idm' things.. > > i'm wondering why nobody puts in the 'en-tact' album by the shamen. > > because that was when they started to really suck. their previous > albums were much better. > > > pretty big over here at the time, together with 808 state' ninety. > > ah yes, now that is a *stellar* album. i still listen to it pretty > regularly. > > -- > Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Plan: Eat right, exercise regularly, die anyway. >

(idm) the shamen/first things