| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1994-09-2617:31 | Mohsen Gamshad <gamshad@tcs.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner cdeurope (telnet cdeurope.com) had both of them in their database.
Mohsen
|
| 1994-09-2623:47 | <AMBIENCE@delphi.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >>In Seattle I purchased the first Scanner release for US$15, but… |
| 1994-09-2617:04 | W. Keenan <wkeenan@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
i noticed from their communique that FSOL has an e-mail address… |
| 1994-09-2718:28 | Chris.Hilker <cspot@netcom.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >> huh? scanner doesn't copyright their works?
>Apparently not. The back of… |
| 1994-09-2823:43 | Lazlo Nibble <lazlo@RT66.com> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > I don't think copyright would have anything to do with it… |
| 1994-09-2807:34 | Pete Ashdown <pashdown@xmission.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >> Scanner has, to my knowledge, released two CDs, Scanner and Scanner 2… |
| 1994-09-2621:16 | Lazlo Nibble <lazlo@RT66.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > Now, I don't know if Thrash or Weston have an email… |
| 1994-09-2622:54 | Dan Nicholson <8bit@vlad.bowker.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner Matt Corwine |
| 1994-09-2714:58 | Matt Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
On Mon, 26 Sep 1994, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Matt Corwine |
| 1994-09-2900:18 | Chris.Hilker <cspot@netcom.com> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >> I don't think copyright would have anything to do with it… |
| 1994-09-2617:23 | Matt Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
On Mon, 26 Sep 1994, W. Keenan wrote:
> also - how many releases… |
| 1994-09-2915:15 | <John.Bus@syd.dcet.csiro.au> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner Howdy,
> I didn't know that it is now illegal to manufacture… |
| 1994-09-2617:42 | Dave Steinhart <angst@psych.colorado.edu> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > > also - how many releases has Scanner put out and are any of… |
| 1994-09-2808:22 | Joseph Morrison <brapman@netcom.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner On Wed, 28 Sep 1994, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> I think Scanner is… |
| 1994-09-2815:56 | Matt Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
On Wed, 28 Sep 1994, bworrell wrote:
> Personally, should Scanner get sued… |
| 1994-09-2916:31 | Larry Spence <lfs@netcom.com> | Re: Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >>This is essentially US law, but there are a couple of refinements… |
| 1994-09-2817:09 | JT <jmilhoan@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > >NOSY) citizen and given to the police. The court ruled that cordless… |
| 1994-09-2822:21 | Stephen Hebditch <steveh@tqmcomms.co.uk> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner In article |
| 1994-09-2619:47 | <ccastge@prism.gatech.edu> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > i noticed from their communique that FSOL has an e-mail address… |
| 1994-09-2814:26 | Dave Walker <marmoset@garnet.msen.com> | Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner On Wed, 28 Sep 1994, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> >> Scanner has, to my… |
| 1994-09-2820:25 | bworrell <bworrell@cclink.fhcrc.org> | Re: Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >This is essentially US law, but there are a couple of refinements… |
| 1994-09-2822:17 | JT <jmilhoan@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner > This is essentially US law, but there are a couple of refinements… |
| 1994-09-2815:20 | bworrell <bworrell@cclink.fhcrc.org> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner >> >> Scanner has, to my knowledge, released two CDs, Scanner and Scanner 2… |
| 1994-09-2819:42 | Alan Marr <monito@netcom.com> | Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner From idm-owner@hyperreal.com Wed Sep 28 10:09:50 1994… |