179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Muffin
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:59:09 +0000
Subject:
Re: [idm] plone (departure from warp)
Msg-Id:
<BA4DE6DD.1E801%muffin@signmytits.com>
In-Reply-To:
<7A73BE04.3176E99E.001977BE@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.0301.gz
on 17/1/03 4:42 pm the person going by the name Ordeish@aol.com at Ordeish@aol.com spake :
quoted 14 lines Plone was dropped from warp (very disappointing) apparently because warp> Plone was dropped from warp (very disappointing) apparently because warp > considered them too whimsical for the label! Plone was a ery good band. > Wonderful analog synth melodies and such very nice. They finished the second > album and then were dropped. The album will not be released unless they find a > new label. If i could I would start a label for them. Ive always loved their > sound. > > Apparently Warp also wanted to drop Broadcast as well, but have too much money > invested in them. Ive always liked the different stuff on Warp but after > hearing all this crap about dropping (and wanting too) really wonderful bands > just because they dont have a sound like Autechre or Squarepusher, I am really > beginning to hate the label. I thought they were better than that, but I guess > they are just like any other asshole record label. I am positive that both > Plone and Broadcast brought in money for them.
I think that both the bands you mention were ones that were bought to the label by Rob [RIP] and that Plone being dropped, and the desire to loose Broadcast, may reflect a change in Warp's direction since Rob's death. But that's my idle speculation. It could be bollocks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org