179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Clint Anderson
To:
Francis Xavier
Cc:
Jared Dunne , Zombiefly , IDM
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:35:45 -0500
Subject:
Re: idm list dissed
Msg-Id:
<CAFhVXM-sCFWhRSr2ng+Wf2tnhK3xNYhDHy4U4c2zBrk5w975ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CAGoUv11REs_qLfviO_zPUH9538Cth8cRpG4CYTH4Xy+MPwh+cw@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2014-09.gz
It Doesn't Matter Clint Anderson Systems Engineer On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Francis Xavier <prophet@nac.net> wrote:
quoted 87 lines The only reason anyone would get annoyed at the term IDM is because it> The only reason anyone would get annoyed at the term IDM is because it > includes the term "Intelligent". That annoys people who have to compete > with everything on every level and hurts their superiority complex. It's > just a name, and should be gotten over. > > As Kawa said: > "and Warp only named their compilation "artificial intelligence", as in > the scientific concept, they never claimed the music was more intelligent > than other music. in fact, Warp called it 'listening music' in the liner > notes. it was the creators of this list who named it." > > This is pretty much the end of the convo to anyone who feels they need to > pick apart the term "IDM". > > ========================== > Francis Xavier > > "It's like sitting on the bank of the river and watching the river waters > go by. And when you so watch, there is neither the observer or the > observed. There is only a movement." - Jiddu Krishnamurti > [image: Halcyon Chillout] <http://www.halcyonchillout.com> > http://www.halcyonchillout.com > > http://www.francisxavier.org > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I never understood why so much time is wasted on bitching about a name of >> a genre of music. Better things..... >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> i always preferred the label "electronica" for the genre. But at the >>> time IDM came to be because the UK was dancing in fields to 4-4 beat piano >>> tracks inter-dispersed with hoover sounds. It was viewed that Autechre etc. >>> was more "listening music", therefore more intelligent than the generic >>> fodder blasting into the countryside at 6am.... i guess :) >>> >>> On 23 September 2014 13:32, kawayama <kawayama@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> bit too much nit-picking and defensiveness going on here, i think. >>>> "intelligent dance music" is an okay name for a mailing list, but a >>>> horrible name for a genre, can we not all agree on that? >>>> >>>> and Warp only named their compilation "artificial intelligence", as in >>>> the scientific concept, they never claimed the music was more intelligent >>>> than other music. in fact, Warp called it 'listening music' in the liner >>>> notes. it was the creators of this list who named it. >>>> >>>> k >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> constant shallowness leads to evil. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _____________________________________________ >>> Sent from my Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K >>> _____________________________________________ >>> noise I make: >>> http://www.soundcloud.com/pushkin >>> http://www.last.fm/music/Pushkin >>> >>> noise I like: >>> http://www.last.fm/user/zombiefly >>> >>> sites I run: >>> http://www.ctran.co.uk >>> http://o-fu-online.net >>> ------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> 22tape/jared dunne >> listen <http://22tape.com> >> > >