179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
tcom
To:
eric hill ,
Date:
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:55:51 +1030
Subject:
Re: (idm) More U.R. vs. Sony
Msg-Id:
<001e01bf45f3$b0709180$0300a8c0@tcom-prime>
Mbox:
idm.9912.gz
http://www.submerge.com/real_audio/UR-049.ram the original http://209.207.190.80/MP3/SF4147.MP3 the legal(?/!@XXX) rip. tcom -----Original Message----- From: eric hill <ehill@best.com> To: idm@hyperreal.org <idm@hyperreal.org> Date: Monday, 13 December 1999 9:59 Subject: Re: (idm) More U.R. vs. Sony
quoted 3 lines from >>from http://www.ram.org/ramblings/philosophy/fmp/copying_primer.html: >> >>"[T]he compulsory license model in music under current Copyright Law...is
a
quoted 4 lines unique aspect of Copyright Law, in that it allows you to make phonorecords>>unique aspect of Copyright Law, in that it allows you to make phonorecords >>of musical compositions after it has been recorded once (usually referred >>to as "covering") as you wish, without permission, as long as an >>appropriate fee is paid per phonorecord distributed. There is absolutely
no
quoted 15 lines permission required, and the original authors have no real say over who>>permission required, and the original authors have no real say over who >>covers the song and in what manner it is covered." > >i haven't heard sony's version, can someone who has comment on an earlier >poster's observation of it having "a cheesy trance beat" behind it? > >eric > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org