179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
eric hill
To:
Date:
Sun, 12 Dec 1999 15:29:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) More U.R. vs. Sony
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSF.4.21.9912121527330.15520-100000@shell3.ba.best.com>
In-Reply-To:
<3.0.6.32.19991212154958.00b96890@shell7.ba.best.com>
Mbox:
idm.9912.gz
quoted 9 lines from >from http://www.ram.org/ramblings/philosophy/fmp/copying_primer.html: > >"[T]he compulsory license model in music under current Copyright Law...is a >unique aspect of Copyright Law, in that it allows you to make phonorecords >of musical compositions after it has been recorded once (usually referred >to as "covering") as you wish, without permission, as long as an >appropriate fee is paid per phonorecord distributed. There is absolutely no >permission required, and the original authors have no real say over who >covers the song and in what manner it is covered."
i haven't heard sony's version, can someone who has comment on an earlier poster's observation of it having "a cheesy trance beat" behind it? eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org