179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
eric hill
To:
Date:
Sun, 6 Jun 1999 12:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) The real reason why ads use so much electronic music
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSF.4.10.9906061253070.9054-100000@shell3.ba.best.com>
In-Reply-To:
<002201beb053$7d627050$90cc2499@eldritch>
Mbox:
idm.9906.gz
quoted 2 lines stances, etc.) but its an example of the type of decisions groups are forced>stances, etc.) but its an example of the type of decisions groups are forced >to make.
i'm not interested in these stories at all (see "can o' worms" below). there are a million of them, but it only takes one or two to cause people to uncontrollably disappear up their own asses...publicly. like i said, the interesting part was the ne'er-cited "other side of the fence." eric onnow: le show
quoted 19 lines -----Original Message-----> >-----Original Message----- >From: eric hill <ehill@best.com> >To: idm@hyperreal.org <idm@hyperreal.org> >Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 11:50 AM >Subject: Re: (idm) The real reason why ads use so much electronic music > > >>the interesting thing about the article that rodney posted was that it >>describes the process from the advertiser's decision to use a form of >>music, not from the musician-being-used can o' worms. >> >>eric, who doesn't bring anything up that he wouldn't debate >> >>onnow: gerhard potuznik : concorde (cheap) >> > > >