179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 19:40:41 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) nu __ge[minidi]scom
Msg-Id:
<199842220305946334@ix.netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9804.gz
On 04/22/98 11:09:53 you wrote:
quoted 4 lines But, as far as recording goes, an analog recording in>But, as far as recording goes, an analog recording in >perfect condition captures *more* of the sound than >a digital recording of the same thing. That's just >a fact.
wrong. this is completely dependent on the medium. assuming that "capturing more of a sound" means capturing as much of the frequencies and amplitudes of a live sound source as possible, then a digital cd captures more of the sound than an analog cassette. a studer 2" deck running at 30ips with dolby sr can capture a little more than a digital cd. and a digital recorder recording at 24 bit 96khz can capture a little more than that. np: black light district "chalice" "a dream is worth a thousand pictures, the mouths of lampreys a thousand more..."