179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Otto Koppius
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:47:54 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: IDM formulas?
Msg-Id:
<199710171147.NAA17547@bets.fbk.eur.nl>
In-Reply-To:
<3446E4E4.FA9@earthlink.net>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
-0 wrote:
quoted 2 lines Same shit in the end, wicked beats most important seems like. More> Same shit in the end, wicked beats most important seems like. More > focus on beat then on melody we'd all tend to agree no?
I wish it were different tho'...
quoted 1 line If it's a good loop, let it run forever I say.> If it's a good loop, let it run forever I say.
Heh :) I once made an Ae tape with "Gnit" looped on the A-side and "Overand" looped on the B-side. Mesmerizing is the appropriate word here...
quoted 2 lines A loop ain't necessarily bad all the time, but it wouldn't be progress (issue> A loop ain't necessarily bad all the time, but it wouldn't be progress (issue > at hand)
Progress can basically be achieved in two ways: by doing something that throws away all rules and standards, ending up as something entirely new ("lateral" progress) or by staying within a certain framework and ending up as a further refinement of a current style ("transversal" progress). RDJ would be an example of the former category, the Basic Channel sound an example of the latter. The same with loopiness: it might not be groundbreaking anymore, but there is still progress possible (and being made).
quoted 2 lines Yes, part of the equation, but I just wanted to focus on RDJ's SAW#1> Yes, part of the equation, but I just wanted to focus on RDJ's SAW#1 > as the place where the formula all came together for what we call IDM.
...as one of the places where the formula... There are more facets to this thing we call IDM than just RDJ.... Otto, resident recalcitrant