179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
szalemandre
To:
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 10:19:30 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) "authorship" vs. "credibility"/ questions
Msg-Id:
<34310A72.A0562856@doubtful.com>
Mbox:
idm.9709.gz
for everyone who's been slamming me: ok, i see your point. but my point was a little tougher to see because of the words i chose. what i'm trying to say is this: none of this really matters. i guess it's kind of a 'those who know are those who know' kind of thing. people with soul. i know i'm probably pissing more people off again, but it happens i guess. i just feel that musicians are usually i little bit more in tune with what's up than just the listeners. (and no, i'm not talking about events that happen or who's on what label) that's why i said this place is filled with too few musicians. i'm just sick of this bjork/credibility/underground thread. dig: if the music's good, keep it and listen to it. don't feel ashamed because the big-boys of idm@hyperreal.org yell at you for fucking your girlfreind to kiss instead of orbital. and all you tightasses about 'keepin it real' in idm, pah. i can understand supporting a scene and all, but pissing on everyone else is pretty lame. (and i particularly feel that it's non-musicians who have the biggest problems with genre-closed-mindedness. just in my experience.) ok. i'm ready for round 2 guys. -eric -- .- Doubtful Productions Evolving Media -. eric sherman http://www.doubtful.com szale@doubtful.com